- A 'wall of maturities' with $1.7 trillion of CRE loans expected to mature between now and 2026
- Borrowers may be refinancing into higher rates and weakening fundamentals (especially for office)
- A discussion of NOI by real estate sector, noting that higher inflation has raised operating cost as has rising insurance cost, both eroding NOI
- If you didn't know the office sector is having problems, now you do.
- " stress in the commercial real estate market is likely to remain a key risk factor to watch in the near term as loans mature, building appraisals and sales resume, and price discovery occurs, which will determine the extent of losses for the market."
"We think they are days from failure. They think it is a temporary problem. This disconnect is dangerous."
Friday, May 31, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 31, 2024
Thursday, May 30, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 30, 2024
A rough day for stocks, despite NVIDIA being up again. American Airlines took it on the chin despite data that shows Americans are traveling in record numbers. Global inflation readings and another poor treasury auction caused some concerns and led to higher bond yields. The Fed's Beige book showed some pessimism with rising uncertainty and greater downside risk despite reporting that national activity continued to expand in April and through mid-May. Treasuries ended the day with steeper yields with the 2Y still under 5% at 4.98% but 10's at 4.62%
Speaking of the Fed, they get a Goldman alum joining the ranks as Beth Hammack will replace the retiring Loreta Mester as the next President of the Cleveland Fed. I didn't spend too much time on the internet, but I'm sure the internet had nothing to say about that.
It seems like every couple of weeks there is some catalyst that leads to higher yields, which sets off some cycle of investors questioning the drivers of higher yields and whether they will feedback into the real economy and drag down stock prices. From there the collective generally looks to the next inflation or employment print to provide the answers that seem elusive at the moment.
We'll get jobless claims, another look at GDP and inventories on the day ahead.
Wednesday, May 29, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 29, 2024
"We hypothesize that the 2020-21 Covid shock led economic agents to widen their conception of what constitutes “unchanged” business conditions. Shell-shocked from the economic volatility of the pandemic recession and its fits-and-starts recovery—economic agents may have redefined their definitions of “unchanged” to encompass a broader and potentially higher range of economic activity growth."
"But it’s not all bad. We’ve had periods of highish (if you call 5% high) rates and lots of growth. Capital will be more expensive, and we probably won’t lavish unlimited capital on anyone who has a tech idea anymore. But that can also mean a healthier and more balanced relationship with risk and a more thoughtful allocation of capital. A zero-rate environment always felt unnatural, even if it was mainly due to market forces."
"Many people think risky markets are riskless these days. That’s what happens when you have ten years of zero rates. Even the biggest names in finance forget what risk means. I, for one, welcome higher forever; the madness needs to end."
Tuesday, May 28, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 28, 2024
"The present situation can be summarized thus:
The Fed is, once again, focused on inflation and how to “manage” its “beloved” instrument, the policy interest rate.
- a permanently higher 2% price level path
- a permanently higher 5% NGDP level growth path
- the same RGDP level gowth path.
If the Fed is “true” to AIT, it will have to bring inflation below 2% for some time. This will also bring the price level to a lower level. Therein lies the danger. Looking at what happened in 2008, to bring the price level down (even if not all the way to the previous level, which, as was mentioned in the “AIT Primer” box above, is not required), the level of NGDP will have to fall. A (maybe) deep recession is the most likely outcome!
The Fed is “scambling” to understand its options. A recent speech by Governor Waller, who wants “several months of good inflation data before lowering rates” is concerned about “what is the neutral interest rate”.
To my knowledge no one has ever pinned it down, with estimates not only varying wildly, but also enclosed within very large confidence bands. As a guide to monetary policy it is quite useless! Since the economy is not anymore in a "low interest rate environment" (which was an important motivator for the change in the Fed monetary Policy framework of August 2020), the Fed is trying to guess how high should interest rates be in the "new environment". Fed talk about rstar is not the "attractor" but the "distractor"!"
I feel like I've been on a theme for a minute (see my last two FOMC recaps), or a career, about uncertainty and the desire for precision where none can be found. I came across this quote in an unusual place and one far afield from finance and economics (perhaps where people in finance and economics should spend a minute - away from finance and economics, outside of excel and DSGE models, etc.)
" Our natural inclination is to be so precise– trying always to forecast accurately what will happen next– that we look upon uncertainty as a bad thing.....we do not know what a day may bring forth...This is generally said with a sigh of sadness; it should be said as an expression of breathless expectation."
See this post from September 14, 2023 for more.
Friday, May 24, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 24, 2024
Yesterday was a tough day for equities despite the previous evenings NVIDIA earnings. The stronger than expected flash PMI's seemed to be part of the culprit as the hotter than expected reading likely pared with yesterday's "hawkish" FOMC Minutes led to higher yields. The 10Y creeps back towards 4.50% off a local low of ~4.35% and the 2Y creeps back towards 5% off a local low of ~4.80%.
As for PMI's both manufacturing and services beat expectations and hitting fastest in 2 years, with services leading. The concern for bond yields was that the input price readings rose sharply in May, "the rate of inflation accelerating to register the second-largest monthly increase seen over the past eight months" and in commentary provided by S&P: " What’s interesting is that the main inflationary impetus is now coming from manufacturing rather than services, meaning rates of inflation for costs and selling prices are now somewhat elevated by pre-pandemic standards in both sectors to suggest that the final mile down to the Fed’s 2% target still seems elusive.”
On the day ahead it's durable goods orders, UofM sentiment and Fed speak. Ok, you can go back to AI, tariffs, elections, data-center power usage, deficits, MMT, the Yen, the Yuan, wars, and whatever else is on your mind.
XTOD: I’m always amazed that mainstream ratings agencies are able to hand out AAA ratings to single-asset loan CMBS (given that diversification is the supposed to be the bedrock of securitisation)
Thursday, May 23, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 23, 2024
- Financial Markets and OMO:
- data pointed to inflation being more persistent than previously expected
- the rise in longer term yields appeared to be due to higher real rates and higher risk premium
- short-term inflation expectations rose, but longer-term inflation expectations were well anchored
- reserves remained abundant
- Staff Review of Economic Situation
- good growth, slowing inflation and better balance in labor markets
- Staff Review of Financial Situation
- recapped market data, mentioned geopolitical situations
- credit remained available despite some tightening of conditions but noted that credit standards continued to tighten for CRE
- the Staff characterized the vulnerabilities of the financial system due to high asset prices as 'elevated'
- Staff Economic Outlook
- The economy was expected to maintain its high rate of resource utilization over the next few years, with projected output growth roughly similar to the staff's estimate of potential growth. The unemployment rate was expected to edge down slightly over 2024 as labor market functioning improved further, and to remain roughly steady thereafter.
- PCE inflation was expected to be close to 2% by 2026
- The Staff cited upside risk to inflation and downside risk to growth
- Participants Views
- some debate over the impact of seasonal patterns and the impact of volatile categories had outsized impact on inflation readings vs. the view that inflation increases had been broad based
- attuned to inflation risks and still expect that inflation would return to 2% over the medium term, taking longer than previously thought
- some discussion of new leases at lower rents ultimately passing through to lower inflation
- despite participants noting some positive factors that could lower inflation, 'Several participants commented that growth of aggregate demand would likely have to slow from its strong pace in recent quarters for inflation to move sustainably toward the Committee's goal'
- Discussion of the impact of immigration on wages and growth
- Discussion/disagreement on productivity, with some believing recent productivity growth will not persist, while others believing it will be sustained in light of things like AI
- Noted the dichotomy of how lower income households were being hit hard by higher rates while wealthy households appeared to be benefiting from easy financial conditions
- Overall attuned to how higher rates could impact financial stability, but believed that other tools should be used to combat financial stability risky without impact policy rates
- many participants commented on their uncertainty about the degree of restrictiveness. These participants saw this uncertainty as coming from the possibility that high interest rates may be having smaller effects than in the past, that longer-run equilibrium interest rates may be higher than previously thought, or that the level of potential output may be lower than estimated.
- Various participants mentioned a willingness to tighten policy further should risks to inflation materialize in a way that such an action became appropriate. Committee Policy Actions
XTOD: The minutes not only made mention of "various" participants willing to consider hikes, they also removed the sentence below about rates being at their peak.
XTOD: Great work Mike Wilson
XTOD: Imagine believing you're running a restrictive monetary with stock markets liquidity goosed up to 188% market cap to GDP.
XTOD: "Commodities protect against structurally higher inflation and diversify better than bonds. A portfolio with 40% exposure to commodities outperformed a traditional 60/40 mix with less downside risk." - BofA
XTOD: Question: What if I don’t want to wait for the monthly CPI release to see what inflation’s up to? Answer: Look at the price changes specifically for sugar and sweets, which are closely correlated with overall CPI https://ow.ly/l43H50RPoyv
XTOD: Investing in yourself is the key to achieving financial freedom. Whether it's learning new skills, starting a side hustle, or taking care of your physical and mental health, investing in yourself has the highest ROI.
Wednesday, May 22, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 22, 2024
Monday, May 20, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 21, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 20, 2024
Mentioned in Friday's post, the recent Blanchard and Bernanke paper on the last mile of inflation seemed to advocate a very Phillip's Curve dominate mentality, that unemployment will have to rise before inflation can return to target. I thought this post from NGDP Targeting proponent Marcus Nunes, citing comments from economist George Selgin, laid out some interesting thoughts in retort to Blanchard and Bernanke. You be the judge of the merits of the arguments.
On the week ahead:
Friday, May 17, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 17, 2024
Dow ~40K, risk assets doing well, people apparently ordering $1,000 Beef Cases in Vegas nightclubs, all against a backdrop where Fed officials stress higher for longer and as some people worry about the consumer. Macro is hard.
"There are better things to be doing than watching the ticker all day, swinging from bull to bear, obsessing over stuff no ne will remember in five years. Lester Freeman said it best on The Wire: "A life, Jimmy, you know what that is? It's what happens while you're waiting for moments that never come." - Joshua Brown (Ritholtz Wealth Management)
Speaking of The Wire, remember that last October I started every post with a quote from The Wire? Those quotes were probably contain more wisdom and value than any commentary on the most recent CPI data.
In data, which data didn't seem to matter, jobless claims were low and perhaps under-looked was the rise in import prices which seems weird given dollar strength, but I didn't investigate. Away from the data in Fedspeak Barkin said it will take more time for inflation to come back to target and Mester echoed much of the same citing the fact that the economy is strong and the Fed risk little by keeping rates higher for longer. Bernanke and Blanchard basically came out and said people need to lose jobs for inflation to come down, kind of what Powell said when he said "there will be pain" in the fight to get inflation back down.
Jamie Dimon believes there are a 'lot of inflationary forces in front of us' but that he believes the markets are failing to properly price risks to a soft landing, including that of higher rates due to higher inflation.
Dimon isn't in the business of predicting rates per se, when he does, he's often wrong, but I do believe he has a track record as a prudent risk manager. When it comes to risk management, remember, 'The price of long term stock market returns is uncertainty and volatility.' - Morgan Housel. And I think what you can learn from everyone wiser than me is what the late great Peter Bernstein said: "survival is the only road to riches. Let me say that again: Survival is the only road to riches. You should try to maximize return only if losses would not threaten your survival and if you have a compelling future need for the extra gains you might earn."
On the day ahead, it's Friday. Maybe re-read the quotes above. The leading indicators and Gov. Waller can wait.
Thursday, May 16, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 16, 2024
CPI downside surprise allows risk assets to reach new record highs (I'm working on my poetic prowess). Taking stock of stocks S&P at 5,308 with records for Nasdaq and Dow as well. Does one CPI print coming in lower than estimate after 3 straight higher than expected prints really mark a new trend? Does it matter Powell says no hikes ever again or something like that and he’s never pivoted, right? (Remember “we’re along way from neutral” in 2018? )
Headline CPI came in at at 3.4% YoY and 0.3% MoM vs. consensus of 3.4% and 0.4%. The MoM Core reading at 0.3% v. the 0.4% est and prior seemed to be what caused the market to rejoice. Slowing primary and owners equivalent rents, declining car prices were highlighted but there still seem to be some persistent inflation in personal services, healthcare and car insurance
Retail sales were unchanged coming in below consensus and showed a decline in the control group.
Still lots of chatter expressing concerns about labor market and loan delinquencies, guess time will tell.
Yields fell 10bps with markets pricing in about 2 rate cuts, with some pulling forward their forecast for the first cut to come in July. The 2Y is 4.73% and 10Y is 4.34%.
On the day ahead it is jobless claims, housing starts, building permits, import prices, industrial production and capacity utilization on the data front and Fed's Williams as the highlight of Fedspeak.
You can start looking forward to a Presidential debate in June.
Wednesday, May 15, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 15, 2024
CPI Day is here, the anticipation is palpable. Unless you care more about meme stocks, anything involving AI, crypto meme coins, longer term ramifications of geopolitics, tariffs, the 2024 election, sports, your family, etc. (hopefully not in that order)...this is the day you've been waiting for all week.
PPI came in hot, maybe those consumer and business inflation surveys mentioned yesterday were onto something. Headline PPI was up +0.5% MoM above the 0.3% est. with services up 0.6%. A lot of attention seems to have landed on the 3.9% increase in the cost of portfolio management. Markets going up, leads to portfolio management fees go up and that is in PPI. That gives a new sense of how/why "financial conditions" matter. Remember when the Fed said they were relying upon financial conditions tightening to do some of the work for them, has that happened? Even yesterday Powell said that he thinks about monetary policy through its "effect on financial conditions more broadly and on the economy". Judging by PPI, I guess the answer to whether financial conditions are tightening is found by asking your financial advisor, after all they are likely making more money because your assets are up.
In other Fed news, both NY Fed and STL Fed had reports out that express some concern in rising credit card delinquencies, something to add to your list of things to keep an eye on.
Powell kept the script on being data dependent as it relates to "higher for longer" and that he isn't ready to prejudge whether inflation will remain persistent going forward.
On the day ahead it's CPI, Retail Sales and moar Fedspeak.
I guess I'll get back to drawing pictures to animate and Tweet out in an effort to cause certain stocks to moon, I'll report back when complete.
XTOD: The market is beyond satire, you can’t make it up
XTOD: Here's what should be done to address inflation: cut government spending, lower overnight rates, and remove the excess liquidity that's still sitting in the RRP facility.
XTOD: I just imposed a series of tariffs on goods made in China: 25% on steel and aluminum, 50% on semiconductors, 100% on EVs, And 50% on solar panels. China is determined to dominate these industries. I'm determined to ensure America leads the world in them.
XTOD: And are lumber tariffs next? This is not the path to a healthier economy!
XTOD: Don't understand how "protecting/hiding" our companies from the global competitive reality helps America "lead." In contrast, it will make our companies weaker by limiting their fitness. It will also drive further inflation. Certainly the lobbyists in DC are happy w/ outcome.
XTOD: People talking abt election odds should be paying attention to the fact that the (actuarial) probability of at least one of the 2 main presidential candidate dying over the next year is ~12%**plus or minus adjustment for current health.
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 14, 2024
Aside from the fun times with GameStop meme trading as "Roaring Kitty" resurfaced on X for the first time in 3 years, it was a pretty quiet market days with all eyes towards inflation data with PPI today and CPI on Wednesday. If you're curious about GameStop, Andrew Tate (I thought he was in jail) vowed to never sell the GameStop shares he bought today, no matter what, "PERMA DONATIONS TO THE CAUSE AGAINST THE SYSTEM". I'm not sure exactly what that means, but time to revisit my post from January on finfluencers and civilization https://edwardquince.blogspot.com/2024/01/daily-economic-update-january-29-2024.html
Yesterday's NY Fed Survey of Consumer Expectations showed increasing median inflation expectations at both the 1Y and 5Y ahead horizons to 3.3% and 2.8% respectively. Consumers also showed confidence in their job prospects. Separately the Cleveland Fed's Survey of Firms Inflation Expectations also showed CEO's and executives raising their 1Y ahead inflation expectations, in this case up to 3.8% from 3.4% back in January. Inflation is so under control that everyone thinks it's not under control, crazy reverse, psyops I'm sure.
If trading meme stocks and inflation data isn't your thing feel free to join the discussion over bat speed and swing length.
On the day ahead it's PPI at 830am and Powell at 10am as the highlights.
Monday, May 13, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 13, 2024
Last week was a good week for equities, despite Friday's UofM report showing further concerns about inflation with rising year ahead inflation expectations (likely due to gas prices). Speaking of inflation, on the week ahead it's all about CPI. The internet and fintwit was ablaze with creating a CPI coffee controversy, with the BLS supposedly removing coffee from the CPI. The story was based on this https://www.bls.gov/cpi/additional-resources/discontinued-series.htm however all indications that coffee is very much still in CPI and is an incredibly small component.
Anyway, we'll see what CPI brings unless something else comes along to change the narrative. Lest we forget about two wars, including an apparent assassination attempt against Zelensky in Ukraine. Or the Kendrick Lamar v. Drake beef for that matter (apparently the Biden campaign used Lamar's diss track "Euphoria" in a campaign video and Lamar's "Not Like Us" broke a Spotify streaming record to become the most streamed American hip-hip song in a single-day with 6.59 million).
If you're not into following Kendrick vs. Drake diss tracks, you could read the latest posts from John Cochrane's Substack called "Fiscal Tidbits". As a starting point, remember, "Fiscal theory does not say that deficits cause inflation. It only says that the fraction of deficit people do not expect to be paid back, either by higher future surplus or by lower future interest costs, is inflationary." In the first post there is an interesting thought on how at higher levels of debt, deficits have a lower impact on inflation.
"surpluses relative to debt drive inflation. Given deficits and expected surpluses, more debt means less inflation. Your intuition about debt being bad is also correct, because it typically means it will be harder for a country to promise future surpluses to pay off deficits. Beware in reading history, or judging whether more debt makes inflation more likely, just what is actually held constant and what is not".....
"The interest cost is important. 1% interest rate means 1% of GDP primary deficit at 100% debt to GDP. It means 2.5% primary deficit at 250% debt to GDP. That’s a reason that, contrary to last point, more debt means more inflation danger. It means more exposure to interest rate changes."
Taking stock we have 2Y yield at 4.87% and 10Y at 4.50%. The last Atlanta Fed GDP Now is at 4.2% vs. 2.23% for the NY Fed GDP Nowcast and the Cleveland Fed Inflation Nowcasting has inflation still running above target.
Friday, May 10, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 10, 2024
As expected the BoE was on hold, though confidence in rate cuts coming as soon as June increased. In the U.S. jobless claims seemed to get the message that people (see Jim Bianco here) were concerned that the data was manipulated after many prints at 212K in the data set, so this time they spiked up to 231K. The 30Y Auction was strong, easing concerns about market demand for longer-term debt (for today at least). Yields moved lower and stocks moved higher, but I'm not sure anyone cares much until next week's CPI data. 2Y is around 4.80% and 10's are around 4.45%.
On the day ahead, UofM sentiment is the highlight. Markets will continue to watch the situation in Gaza and the possibility that the U.S. will cut off certain weapons shipments if Israel invades Rafah.
XTOD: "Girard’s theory of mimetic desire describes our fundamental compulsion to want what others want or have. 'We don’t even know what our desire is. We ask other people to tell us our desires'...'you desire stuff exclusively because other people desire it.'"
Thursday, May 9, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 9, 2024
- "It's the presence of debt that creates the possibility of default, foreclosure, and bankruptcy."
- "Does that mean debt is a bad thing and should be avoided? Absolutely not. Rather, it’s a matter of whether the amount of debt is appropriate relative to (a) the size of the overall enterprise and (b) the potential for fluctuations in the enterprise’s profitability and asset value."
- This reminds me and reminded Marks of one of my favorite Marks' memos https://www.oaktreecapital.com/docs/default-source/memos/2008-12-17-volatility-leverage-dynamite.pdf?sfvrsn=c7bc0f65_2
- "As Housel puts it, “ as debt increases, you narrow the range of outcomes you can endure in life.”
- The reason for taking on debt is simple, it's cheaper than equity, allows you to 'bet' more and when you're right you end up winning more.
- Of course when you're wrong you lose more...
- And this is where Marks' makes his mark in the memo: "But levered portfolios face a downside risk to which there isn’t a corresponding upside: the risk of ruin. The most important adage regarding leverage reminds us to “never forget the six-foot-tall person who drowned crossing the stream that was five feet deep on average.” To survive, you have to get through the low points, and the more leverage you carry (everything else being equal), the less likely you are to do so. "
- And in referencing Housel referencing Taleb, Marks' provides "It’s the isolated “tail events” that saddle levered investors with the greatest losses" and "One is thus capable of unwittingly playing Russian roulette – and calling it by some alternative “low risk” name. " and " as illustrated by recent events, we rarely consider outcomes that have happened only once a century . . . or never."
- So where does that leave things with regards to Marks' views on using leverage:
- "investors should usually use less than the maximum available. Successful investments, perhaps enhanced by the moderate use of leverage, should usually provide a good-enough return – something few people think about in good times."
- The risker the asset, the less leverage you should use and
- Adhere to Buffett's "Margin of Safety"
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 8, 2024
Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 7, 2024
Ignorance. Finally, we should admit that neither we, nor central banks, really understand how the economy works and how monetary policy affects the economy. There is a complex verbal doctrine that bounces around central banks, policy institutions, and private analysts, asserting that interest rates have a relatively mechanical, reliable, and understood effect on “spending” through a “transmission mechanism” that though operating through “long and variable lags” gives the Fed essentially complete control over inflation in a few years. The one thing I know from 40 years of study, and all of you know as well, is that there is no respectable well-tested economic model that produces anything like that verbal doctrine. (More here.) Knowing what you don’t know, and that nobody else does either, is knowledge. Our empirical knowledge is also skimpy, and the historical episodes underlying that experience come with quite different fiscal and financial-structure preconditions. 1980 was a different world in many ways, and also combined fiscal and microeconomic reform with high interest rates
Monday, May 6, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 6, 2024
"Persuaded as the Secretary is that the proper funding of the present debt will render it a national blessing, yet he is so far from acceding to the position, in the latitude in which it is sometimes laid down, that “public debts are public benefits,” a position inviting to prodigality and liable to dangerous abuse, that he ardently wishes to see it incorporated as a fundamental maxim in the system of public credit of the United States, that the creation of debt should always be accompanied with the means of extinguishment. This he regards as the true secret for rendering public credit immortal." -ALEXANDER HAMILTON, first U.S secretary of the Treasury (1790)
And courtesy of George Hall:
"What a Government spends the public pay for. There is no such thing as an uncovered deficit. But in some countries, it seems possible to please and content the public, for a time at least..." - John Maynard Keynes, 1923, A Tract on Monetary Reform, p. 62.
Anyway, why does a government want a monopoly over currency, see here
XTOD: To recap this week ... On Wednesday the question to Powell was if they would hike. On Friday, we are asking if they cut this summer. Any bets on what next week brings?
Friday, May 3, 2024
Daily Economic Update: May 3, 2024
-
I see no a priori way to answer the question of whether a central-bank policy of holding the money supply constant, limiting the liquidity...
-
One Big Beautiful Blog Why is this blog One Big Beautiful Blog? Well the plan for this blog was to write "the definitive guide to finan...
-
For the rest of the week, I’m going to start my post with a quote from the same book. If you can guess the book without the help of Google o...
Daily Economic Update: June 6, 2025
Broken Bromance Trump and Xi talk, but Trump and Musk spar. I don’t know which headline matters more for markets, but shares of Tesla didn’...