"We think they are days from failure. They think it is a temporary problem. This disconnect is dangerous."
Friday, July 19, 2024
Daily Economic Update: July 19, 2024
Thursday, July 18, 2024
Daily Economic Update: July 18, 2024
- The premise: "how can anyone be without doubt."
- Macro-forecasting is impossible: (a) we don't know what's going to happen and (b) we don't know how the markets will react to what actually does happen
- The economist consensus has been wrong about the path of rate cuts and about the odds of a recession.
- He remarks about how some people have ended up capturing massive gains in the stock market based on a belief the Fed would be cutting rates. Clearly the Fed didn't cut but stocks rose nonetheless. In other words, they ended up right for the wrong reasons.
- "Markets swing more than economies and companies. Why? Because of the unpredictability of market participants' psyches or emotions."
- "Intelligence, education, access to data and analysis can't be sufficeint to produce correct forecasts.". Quoting John Kenneth Galbraith, "There are two kinds of forecasters: those who don't know, and those who don't know they don't know."
- People underestimate the role of luck in making money. There is a specious association of money and intelligence.
- Have intellectual humility - realize you might not be sure, or you don't know
- Certainty in fields like politics, economics and investing is absurd.
Uncertainty is an interesting word and one that is often conflated with "risk" in the financial setting and perhaps is a little confusing. I've found the following to be a helpful guide: "risk refers to all outcomes that can be insured against, uncertainty to those which cannot." And "..uncertainty as both Keynes and Knight define it, but which the mainstream denies: a situation where we have no scientific basis for calculating a ratio (probability)." To further illustrate: "For example, if one smoker out of ten died of lung cancer, the probability of smokers dying of lung cancer is 10 percent. This set of numerical probabilities [cardinal probabilities] is the standard domain of risk as recognized by actuaries...At the opposite extreme is uncertainty...where we have no scientific basis for calculating a ratio." Keynes (as reported by Skidelsky) sums this up as "The magnitudes of some pairs of probabilities we shall be able to compare numerically [cardinal probabilities], others in respect of more or less only (i.e. 'more or less likely', "ordinal probabilities), and others not at all [uncertainty]." If you're ever interested in reading more about risk and uncertainty (and Keynes views on uncertainty), author Peter Bernstein's classic "Against The Gods" is worth a read.
While uncertainty might be scary, Bernstein laments: "A tremendous idea lies buried in the notion that we simply do not know. Rather than frightening us, Keyne's words bring great news: we are not prisoners of an inevitable future. Uncertainty makes us free."
Or as Frank Herbert said in the Dune series: “to know the future absolutely! All of it! What fortunes could be made — and lost on such absolute knowledge, eh?” but “what a hellish gift that’d be. What utter boredom! Every living instant he’d be replaying what he knew absolutely … Ignorance has its advantages.”
Given the uncertainty and the bombardment of noise in the current economic environment, I was reminded of two quotes in the famous wall street book "Where Are the Customers' Yachts?" by Fred Schwed: "In this case, the notion that the financial future is not predictable is just too unpleasant to be given any room at all in the Wall Streeter's consciousness" and "For one thing, customers have an unfortunate habit of asking about the financial future. Now if you do someone the signal honor of asking him a difficult question, you may be assured that you will get a detailed answer. Rarely will it be the most difficult of all answers-"I don't know".
A prudent way to navigate the inherent uncertainty in the world and economy is by maintaining some flexibility, a buffer, a margin of safety and a level of creativity in planning. This flexibility isn't free, it's the extra turn of leverage not taken, it's the liquidity not deployed, or other analogous things, but it also provides a valuable option to change course when things aren't working out. It creates a condition to increase the odds of survival and survival is what allows individuals and businesses to adhere to Charlie Munger's first rule of compounding: "The first rule of compounding is to never interrupt it unnecessarily".
Wednesday, July 17, 2024
Daily Economic Update: July 17, 2024
Tuesday, July 16, 2024
Daily Economic Update: July 16, 2024
Stocks rose, the yield curve steepened. Powell indicated he's good to cut rates before inflation returns to 2%. 2's10's curve is now just 22bps inverted on Fed cuts and steepening on the long end due to predictions that if elected Trump's policies would increase deficits and inflation. Trump named J.D. Vance is running mate and for some reason when I hear Vance I only think of The Office.
Nothing on the earnings front is causing any major concerns at the moment.
Monday, July 15, 2024
Daily Economic Update: July 15, 2024
Whenever one trades, they trade against "what's priced in". I think investors tend to trade the election based on things like tariffs, taxes/fiscal policy and regulation, but that is somewhat distinct from what might be termed a broader political risk described above. Is there still 0 risk premium priced into U.S. markets for political risk, or is there some risk premium that could be harvested if it's mispricing the true political risk? If political risk is rising and investors ultimately demand a risk premium in things like U.S. Treasuries, how much and when does it get priced in?
Friday, July 12, 2024
Daily Economic Update: July 12, 2024
Thursday, July 11, 2024
Daily Economic Update: July 11, 2024
"Maybe markets have changed from when I learned that good investing involved going to a mall and buying stock in the stores that were crowded. I suppose financial education has never been great.
The last 20 years of markets were weird. If the market will be dominated by a few big, fast-growing stocks, maybe stock picking is a good idea and diversification is for suckers and fools. If the world is crazy, maybe a currency with no discernible value is a smart investment.But I doubt it. A decade or two is a short time in finance, and no one market condition lasts forever. This is why good investing, not speculation, involves diversifying as much as you can. It is just efficient. As markets likely enter a more volatile phase from increased concentration, diversification will be more important than ever.....
I suppose a bear market will teach that hard lesson. Gen X and Millennials each came of financial age during bear markets—they are more risk-averse, maybe too much so. But I think we need to take a hard look at financial education, which often fails to include basic risk principles, rather than rely on people losing money and learning the hard way."
Wednesday, July 10, 2024
Daily Economic Update: July 10, 2024
"Although it is not certain that anyone will be ever able to prove conclusively whether or not bubbles exist, research shows that many famous financial crisis that have been portrayed as bubbles were not bubbles at all."
DeRosa references Occam's razor, which calls for always seeking the explanation that makes the fewest assumptions possible, and Mark Rubinstein's The Prime Directive, which says that you should attempt to explain asset prices by rational models as reasons to search first for fundamental, rational explanations for asset prices before resorting to "bubbles" as the last resort.
What makes things more interesting is that many calls for AI stocks being overvalued are being driven by fundamental views that capex spending is too high for the current and expected use cases, not to mention things like energy consumption and water usage.
XTOD: Arthur Schopenhauer: "Man can do what he wills, but not will as he will." Modern medicine: "Hey, Arthur, ask your doctor of Ozempic is right for you."
XTOD: The infamous 'Warren Buffett Indicator' has officially hit 195% which is the highest in history - higher than the dot com bubble, global financial crisis, and the 2022 COVID crash
XTOD: Currently one of the most compressed periods for the $VIX in the last 10yrs. Dispersion has been at or under current levels during just a handful periods of time.
XTOD: DALIO: ".. I feel like I am faced with the choice between a strong, unethical, almost fascist Republican Party and a frail, untruthful, and enigmatic Democratic Party that is failing to make clear what they will do when their sitting president can no longer serve."
-
One Big Beautiful Blog Why is this blog One Big Beautiful Blog? Well the plan for this blog was to write "the definitive guide to finan...
-
Another day, another dollar for the top dog with the gold flea collar - that's the S&P & Nasdaq which both set yet another all-t...
-
I see no a priori way to answer the question of whether a central-bank policy of holding the money supply constant, limiting the liquidity...
Daily Economic Update: June 6, 2025
Broken Bromance Trump and Xi talk, but Trump and Musk spar. I don’t know which headline matters more for markets, but shares of Tesla didn’...