Daily Economic Update: February 19, 2025

Yields rose and stocks found a way to set a new record high.  The S&P finished at 6,129, despite Meta snapping its winning streak.  The 2Y ended the day at 4.31% and the 10Y reclaimed 4.50, now yielding 4.56%.

There was little in the way of tangible data, but home builder sentiment fell as tariff concerns on the cost side.

Gold hit new record highs at 2,934. Gold was also in the news as Elon toys with the idea of auditing Fort Knox at the urging of Rand Paul.

I’d write more, but I gave you a decent amount yesterday, did you read it all?  If so and you’re bored, use the search function and search for something like “uncertainty”.

On the day ahead we get new housing starts, FOMC Minutes and the 20Y auction.

XTOD: Pershing Square has submitted a proposal to Howard Hughes Holdings (NYSE: HHH) http://howardhughes.com to acquire 10 million newly issued shares of the company at $90 per share.  When combined with the 18.9 million shares that are currently held by the Pershing Square Funds, we will own 48% of the company.   If the transaction goes forward, I will become Chairman and CEO, Ryan Israel, CIO, and Ben Hakim President, and we will make available the full resources of Pershing Square to HHH to build a diversified holding company, or one could say, a modern-day Berkshire Hathaway.  

The new HHH will acquire controlling interests in private and public companies that meet Pershing Square's criteria for business quality.  HHH's principal subsidiary, Howard Hughes Corporation, led by David O'Reilly CEO, will continue on its mission and strategic plan to develop, grow, and own small 'cities,' or master planned communities. HHH's major holdings include the Woodlands in Houston, Summerlin in Las Vegas, Teravalis in Phoenix, and a 60-acre condominium development project on Waikiki Beach in Hawaii called Ward Village. 

Owning small and growing MPCs that will eventually become large cities in the best pro-business markets in the country is a great long-term business.  It's a lot better than a dying textile company.  You can learn the details about the transaction here: https://businesswire.com/news/home/20250218932320/en/Pershing-Square-Announces-Revised-Proposal-to-Howard-Hughes-Holdings  We look forward to sharing more about the story tomorrow at 9am EST.  The presentation will stream live from my X account 

@BillAckman

XTOD: Bill, why are you asking to get paid 1.5% of HHH's mkt cap every year? This is obviously not the way Buffett does it.

XTOD: "why shouldn't I charge a fee on market cap and call myself the next Warren Buffett?"

XTOD: Worth noting that all the recent news over plane crashes is probably just the result of attention bias Plane crashes are still on a downward trend  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GkFizhBWEAA745U?format=png&name=small

XTOD: Three questions determine 99% of the happiness in your life:

1. What am I working on and why? 

2. Who am I spending time with and why?

3. How well am I treating my body and why? 

Everything else is noise.

.

https://x.com/BillAckman/status/1891957378603491339

https://x.com/Seawolfcap/status/1891960752027627890

https://x.com/FrederikNeckar/status/1891985556449460422

https://x.com/IAmMarkManson/status/1891851918575599955

Edward Quince's Wisdom Bites: The Marks Series - The Futility of Macro Forecasting and the Value of "I Don't Know"

Edward Quince (EQ): Howard, one of the prevailing themes on this blog is the inherent uncertainty in financial markets, often summarized by the difficult answer, "I don't know". You've written extensively about the value—or lack thereof—in forecasting the future. Why is macro forecasting an area you advise investors to largely ignore?

Howard Marks (HM): Macro predictions are unlikely to give you an edge. There are two main problems. First, we don’t know what’s going to happen. The world is too complex, too erratic, and too full of surprises to make spot forecasts of anything of significance. Second, even if a forecast turns out to be correct, we don't know how the markets will react to what actually does happen. Forecasting is uncertain, so it's safer not to try to time markets based on predictions.

EQ: You mention that in efficient markets, correct forecasts are potentially very profitable, but also hard to make consistently. Is the consensus view of economists any better?

HM: The consensus view is usually an extrapolation of the current condition and is already embedded in the price of an asset. Most forecasts tend to cluster around historic norms and call for only small changes, underestimating the potential for radical change. If you are merely forecasting the most likely outcome, you are highly unlikely to hang your spreadsheet on predicting a discontinuity. Furthermore, most forecasters have average ability, and we rarely see their track records.

EQ: You advocate for the "I don't know" school of investing. What does this intellectual humility require of an investor in terms of action?

HM: The "I don't know" investor must face up to the uncertainty that surrounds the macro future. Instead of trying to divine the next economic move, we should devote ourselves to specialized research in market niches that others find uninteresting or overly complicated. We will continue to try to "know the knowable". This means focusing on micro factors relating to companies, assets, and securities where it is possible to obtain a knowledge advantage through the expenditure of time and effort. By concentrating on avoiding pitfalls and investing based on in-depth analysis, conservatively estimated tangible values, and modest purchase prices, we can proceed without relying on macro-forecasts.

EQ: So, the valuable forecasts are those that call for radical change, but those are rarely right. In lieu of perfect foresight, how do we protect ourselves?

HM: We must acknowledge the limits of our knowledge. This humility should drive us to employ the Margin of Safety. The margin of safety is, in essence, rendering unnecessary an accurate forecast of the future.

The Edward Quince Takeaway

Embrace intellectual humility: recognize that "Nobody knows" the macro future, and those who claim certainty should be met with skepticism. Focus your efforts on knowing the knowable—deep, bottom-up research in niche areas where superior insight is achievable—and rely on a robust Margin of Safety rather than unreliable predictions.

Daily Economic Update: September 13, 2023

$29 dongles, an attempt to impeach Biden, MGM casino cyber attack, covid, UK GDP contracting, but it's CPI that is in focus today. At the last FOMC meeting, the Fed had identified five pieces of economic data that would inform their upcoming decision, those were: the Employment Cost Index back on July 28, the two Jobs reports (8/4 and 9/1) and the two CPI reports (8/10 and today's upcoming report), most commentators and the market believe those reports, which have shown some slowing in labor data and cooling inflation, will likely leave the Fed on pause next week (CME FedWatch has probability of a pause at 93%), but we'll see what happens with today's CPI.   To start the day, the 2Y is up 3bps to 5.03% and the 10Y is higher by 3-4bps to 4.31%.   On the cap we get CPI and the 30Y Bond Auction.  If you're looking for bank forecast for the inflation read you can find them here.

If you missed it yesterday, Howard Mark's put out his most recent memo. As is typical of Howard's memo's, it's worth a read.  He spends some time using tennis as an analogy, harkening back to Charlie Ellis' classic "The Loser's Game" in which Ellis argues that argues that lay investors have the best chance of success in investing in the stock market by avoiding costly mistakes, minimizing cost and focusing on asset allocation and passive investing.  Mark's states: "The amateur doesn’t have to hit winners to win, and that’s a good thing, because he or she generally is incapable of doing so dependably."

As we look ahead today's inflation reading, it's always "fun" to reflect on inflation, so here's a few gem's from Irving Fisher's classic "The Money Illusion":

• "Money Illusion"; that is the failure to perceive that the dollar, or any other unit of money, expands or shrinks in value.
• "As long as a dollar is not safe, any agreement to pay a dollar is not safe. However certain it may be that you are going to get the promised dollar, it is not at all sure what the dollar is going to be worth when you get it."
  
• "In short if more money pays for the same goods their price must rise, just as if more butter is spread over the same slice of bread it must be spread thicker, the thickness represents the price level, the bread the quantity of goods."
• "..the only important fact, in so far as the price level is concerned, is the relation between these two circulations [money and goods]...if the circulation of money increases relatively to the circulation of goods, the price level will rise. If, on the contrary, it decreases relatively, the price level will fall; that is, whether the butter is thick or thin depends on whether there is much or little butter relative to the bread."
• "War has always been by far the greatest expander of paper money and credit, and therefore the cause of the greatest price upheavals in history."
• "[Inflation] It would, indeed, be of no importance if everybody's income were adjusted to the change in prices. But this is not and cannot be the case...a change in the money yardstick, the dollar, is far more serious, and for three reasons:
• it affects all sales
• it is used for long-term contracts...we are constantly contracting to pay present dollars for future dollars...it makes tremendous difference, for instance, to a bond holder.
• these disasterous effects are not perceived because of money illusion
• "when your house is burglarized, society is none the poorer..that would be cold comfort to you..in somewhat the same sense this burglarizing dollar is defrauding people...it is social injustice."
• "while inflation is going on, the general public finds it hard to admit that there can be too much money....After rapid inflation once starts, the clamor for more money often grows louder and louder."
• "When prices are rising wages and salaries are, as it were, running after a lost train."
• "Business is always injured by uncertainty. Uncertainty paralyzes effort, and uncertainty in the purchasing power of the dollar is the worst of all business uncertainties."
  
• "As inflation goes on, the workers continually grow more dissatisfied and attribute their plight to an intentional plundering by a social system of exploitation." "Out of such discontent, therefore came Bolshevism and other radical theories."
  
• "worst examples of inflation have come from unbalanced government budgets. As we have seen, when a government cannot make both ends meet, it pays its bills by manufacturing the money needed."

XTOD: A picture of inflation as a tax on the average family: https://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-09-12/us-inflation-adjusted-incomes-fell-2-3-in-2022-from-prior-year?srnd=undefined#xj4y7vzkg

XTOD: Every Twitter economist is saying the same brain dead, out of touch thing…“Why are the American people so negative on the economy? GDP is up!”  Maybe because they just watched their purchasing power be annihilated by generational inflation, real household incomes have fallen for 3 years in a row and wealth inequality continues to expand. All while their tax dollars are being wasted and/or sent overseas.  GDP doesn’t come up at the kitchen table for normal Americans you clowns.
“Honey… the credit card bill is due and we don’t have enough to cover it this month. Our groceries have doubled and student loans are restarting soon. There’s also a possibility of layoffs coming at work.”  “Oh don’t worry about that. GDP is trending stronger than expected!”

XTOD: Today we broke the record for the longest streak of trading days (210) with an inverted 10yr/3mth yield curve.  What that means, you be the judge...

XTOD: "We don't have enough Americans to afford what is going on out there right now."  Housing Market Set For A "Cat 5" Storm, Worse Than The Great Financial Crisis.

XTOD: Let me make one thing clear on  @IRSnews  ERC.  Small business owners who qualified rightly claimed this. GOOD. Law was designed FOR THEM.  Years later, most new claimants are being SOLD the ERC for 25-30% commission. Most new claims are fraud.  Danny Werfel knows it. Good for him!

XTOD: Don't believe me? Since 1983, whenever entitlement spending pushed deficits too high, Congress responded by cutting defense and social spending (education, veterans, kids), and raising middle-class taxes. And it will get much worse.

XTOD: A CDC advisory panel met to come up with a recommendation on whether updated COVID shots approved by the government should be used broadly or targeted to specific at-risk populations, setting the stage for the launch of a re-vaccination campaign

XTOD: Government: "OK so there's a pandemic, but don't worry we're going to let you not make payments for 3 years." 
Borrowers: "OK cool, I'm going to buy a house with that money." 
G: "Wait no, that's not what we said..."
B: "OK I also bought a new car"
G: "Wait stop, that's not how this works."
B: "We're in Europe on vacation, AirBnB does Klarna now."
G: "......"

Edward Quince's Wisdom Bites: The Marks Series - Second-Level Thinking and Contrarianism

Edward Quince (EQ): Howard, given how easy it is to access data today, many investors believe they are intellectually superior. You argue that true superiority requires a concept you call "second-level thinking". What is the core distinction between first-level and second-level thinking?

Howard Marks (HM): Superior investing isn't easy. Anyone who thinks it is must be a first-level thinker. First-level thinking is simplistic and superficial, such as looking for the highest-quality company, the best product, or the fastest earnings growth, without considering the price or investor perception. Second-level thinking is deep, complex, and requires you to think differently and better than the consensus.

EQ: Can you give us an example of how this applies to fundamental analysis?

HM: Certainly. A first-level thinker says: "That's a great company; we should buy it". A second-level thinker asks: "It is a great company, but everyone agrees, so its valuation is sky-high. If anything goes wrong, the stock will plummet. I'll avoid it". For your performance to diverge from the norm, your expectations—and thus your portfolio—have to diverge from the norm, and you have to be more right than the consensus.

EQ: This seems tightly linked to contrarianism. How important is resisting the herd mentality to achieving long-term success?

HM: It is essential. Contrarianism means consciously looking for things others haven’t recognized. Since the consensus view of the future is already embedded in the price of an asset, to bring above average profits, a forecast generally must be different from the consensus and accurate. We believe strongly in contrarianism. That means leaning away from the direction chosen by most others: Sell when they’re euphoric, and buy when they’re afraid.

EQ: Acting against the crowd takes courage, especially since there is often a period where following the herd seems smart, and the abstainer looks foolish.

HM: That period of underperformance is inevitable, but the roles are inevitably reversed in the long run. You must be able to stand by your non-consensus view, even if the early going suggests it’s wrong. Ultimately, superior investing requires not just possessing data, but drawing superior inferences and applying second-level thinking. We must recognize that the market will only be permanently efficient when investors are permanently objective and unemotional—in other words, never. This imperfection provides the opportunity for skill to outperform.

The Edward Quince Takeaway

To achieve superior results, you must engage in second-level thinking: being different and being better than the consensus. Recognize that opportunities exist because other people have made mistakes. Dare to be a conscious contrarian, buying what others hate and selling what others love, because following the herd ensures average results at best.

Daily Economic Update: September 13, 2024

ECB cut their deposit rate by 25bps as expected to 3.50% while also cutting their growth forecast through 2026 and showing somewhat sticky inflation in their forecast, noting base effects.  There were also 60bp cuts to the main refinancing rate and marginal lending rate in what was viewed as a technical change necessary to reduce the premium banks pay to borrow relative to what they earn on deposits at the ECB.  Markets are pricing in a possible pause at their next meeting. 

Stateside PPI showed higher core PPI than expected and inital claims were relatively benign.  Yields rose a little more and stocks continued to rally.  The 2Y is 3.66% and the 10Y is 3.69%

Also making the news was that Berkshire Hathaway's Vice Chair Ajit Jain sold half his stake in the company, which of course leads to a ton of speculation as to why?

As I probably remind readers every few weeks, following day to day data is largely a waste of time because the shelf life on this data is so short, it's immediately replaced by the next most important thing (like next week's retail sales) and we frequently fall for noise and completely miss the signal.  We also fail to develop any good filters.  What information do you actually need to better determine if your investment or decision will help reach your goals for it over the horizon.  If you don't know what's important, the qualitative, you can get trapped in the noise.

I posted this back on January 17, 2023:

"providing you with a stream of data and opinion is a business, a business predicated on a demand by investors (including speculators) to be told by someone else what to do (credit to Ben Graham's writing for this phrase).  The incentives are such that adding noise, complexity and a constant pressure to do something is part of the business. 

Morgan Hounsel wrote about this in a blog post Trying Too Hard in which he tells the story of Jon Stewart interviewing CNBC's Jim Cramer:  "Years ago Jon Stewart interviewed Jim Cramer. When pressed on CNBC content that ranged from contradictory to inane, Cramer said, “Look, we’ve got 17 hours of live TV a day to do.” Stewart responded, “Maybe you can cut down on that.” He’s right. But if you’re in the TV business, you can’t."

Anyway, enjoy your Friday and the UofM sentiment.  Listen to Howard Mark's in XTOD below.

XTOD: One of the most interesting things the PPI tracks that the CPI doesn't is retail markups. Retail markup growth has slowed considerably & this has been a contributor to disinflation. In August in particular, growth in grocery markups fell to 0.7% YY, the slowest in 3 years.

XTOD: A masterclass by Howard Marks on how to think about risk.

https://youtu.be/WXQBUSryfdM?si=rmI9woorI_QpTrWq

XTOD: "Great leaders have streak of unorthodoxy. They’re creative innovators.” https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GO6pO3EXUAAZBBm?format=jpg&name=medium

XTOD: Most people wait too long to go into action, generally out of fear.  They want more money or better circumstances.   You must go the opposite direction and move before you think you are ready.

XTOD: Intelligence without courage leads to anxiety because you will spend your time overthinking instead of acting, taking risks, improving your life.

XTOD: When there is an opportunity, I do not hit. It hits all by itself.

Edward Quince's Wisdom Bites: The Marks Series - Leverage: The Accelerator to Ruin

Edward Quince (EQ): Howard, your memos have repeatedly sounded the alarm on the use of leverage, particularly in times of low-risk perception. Why do you characterize leverage as the ultimate two-edged sword?

Howard Marks (HM): Leverage doesn’t add value or make an investment better. It merely magnifies the gains and losses. Volatility combined with leverage equals dynamite. The temptation is clear: leverage is a way to let you bet more than your capital, and it can turn an inadequate 6% return into a handsome 10% on your capital.

EQ: But when it goes wrong, the consequences seem catastrophic, disproportionate even to the original mistake. You’ve used a very vivid analogy to illustrate this downside risk.

HM: That’s right. Levered portfolios face a downside risk to which there isn’t a corresponding upside: the risk of ruin. We must "never forget the six-foot-tall person who drowned crossing the stream that was five feet deep on average”. To survive, you have to get through the low points, and the more leverage you carry, the less likely you are to do so. The presence of debt is precisely what creates the possibility of default, foreclosure, and bankruptcy.

EQ: We see this pattern repeated across crises, from Long-Term Capital Management to recent credit crunches. Why does the market continue to use it excessively?

HM: Leverage pushes routine risks into something capable of producing ruin. When risk aversion is at cyclical lows, people will invest anyway, even if the reward for taking incremental risk is skimpy. Investors often use leverage to try to wring acceptable results from low-return investments. The fundamental risk is that highly leveraged positions are subject to margin calls or can’t bar the door against capital withdrawals, which can lead to a downward spiral of forced selling.

EQ: So, when is the right time to use leverage, if ever?

HM: Leverage should only be used on the basis of demonstrably cautious assumptions. We believe it can be wise to use leverage to take advantage of high offered returns and excessive risk premiums, but it’s unwise to use it to try to turn low offered returns into high ones. The riskier the underlying assets, the less leverage should be used to buy them. Conservative assumptions on leverage will keep you from maximizing gains but possibly save your financial life in bad times.

The Edward Quince Takeaway

Treat leverage as a tool for magnification, not a silver bullet for guaranteed returns. Understand that increased debt narrows the range of outcomes you can endure. Prioritize the security of your capital—and your survival—by maintaining sufficient prudence and adhering to a Margin of Safety, especially when combined with volatile assets.

Edward Quince's Wisdom Bites: The Marks Series - Risk Control and the Road to Riches

Edward Quince (EQ): Howard, your emphasis on risk control is a cornerstone of your investment philosophy. We frequently highlight Morgan Housel’s insight that "survival is the only road to riches". How critical is it for investors to prioritize protection over maximizing returns?

Howard Marks (HM): Survival is indeed the only road to riches. You must strive to maximize return only if losses would not threaten your survival. We believe firmly that “if we avoid the losers, the winners will take care of themselves”. We aim for a high batting average, not home runs. Most of the investing careers that produce the best records are notable at least as much for the absence of losses and losing years as they are for spectacular gains.

EQ: That sounds like a defensive approach, focused on avoiding mistakes. How do we define that necessary defense?

HM: Investing defensively requires prioritizing the avoidance of losses. The key concept here is the Margin of Safety. Margin of safety means you shouldn’t pay prices so high that they presuppose things going right. Instead, prices should be so low that you can profit—or at least avoid loss—even if things go wrong. This buffer ensures you survive the low points.

EQ: But when markets are soaring, focusing on risk control can feel like a penalty. Investors worry about "opportunity cost"—missing out on gains.

HM: This is the core tension. We constantly deal with two main risks: the risk of losing money and the risk of missing opportunity. Investors should strive to balance both. However, if you opt for defense, you should get higher lows but also lower highs. We tell people that in good times, it’s good enough to be average, because we set up our portfolios to outperform in bad times. When others are euphoric, that puts us in danger. It is by being willing to cede much of the return distribution lying between “solid” and “maximum” that we prioritize survival. You can completely avoid one risk or the other, or you can compromise, but you can’t eliminate both.

EQ: In short, this philosophy requires tremendous fortitude and a willingness to look "dowdy" during bull markets.

HM: Indeed. You must cultivate humility, acknowledge uncertainty, and make prudent decisions. Investing scared will prevent hubris and increase the chances that your portfolio is prepared for things going wrong. If nothing goes wrong, the winners will take care of themselves. You never want to be caught "swimming without a bathing suit" when the tide goes out.

The Edward Quince Takeaway

Prioritize survival above all else, remembering that the absence of losses contributes more to long-term success than spectacular gains. Build your strategy around a sufficient Margin of Safety—the flexibility, prudence, and liquidity needed to navigate the inevitable low points without risking permanent loss of capital.

 

Edward Quince's Wisdom Bites: The Marks Series - The Market Pendulum: Mastering Cycles and Extremes

Edward Quince (EQ): Howard, welcome. My blog often laments the financial world's short memory. When you look across history, what principle about the markets seems most dependable, and yet most consistently ignored by investors?

Howard Marks (HM): It is simply the inevitability of cycles. The mood swings of the securities markets consistently resemble the movement of a pendulum. While the midpoint of the arc best describes the location of the pendulum "on average," it spends very little time there. Instead, it is almost always swinging toward or away from the extremes of its arc, moving between euphoria and depression, or between celebrating positives and obsessing over negatives.

EQ: That sounds intuitive, yet we constantly see people caught off guard. If cycles are so reliable, why do investors repeatedly fail to heed them?

HM: The error stems from an excessive proclivity to believe the positives—and disregard the negatives—prompted by the desire to make money. This leads to the most dangerous phrase in investing: “This time is different”. This phrase is a recurring bull-market cliché that always bears scrutiny. The greatest mistakes regarding the economic cycle result from a willingness to believe that it will not recur. Although history does not repeat itself exactly, it "does rhyme" because of the tendency of investors to forget lessons and repeat behavior.

EQ: So, the extremes of investor psychology are really the primary driver?

HM: Absolutely. Patterns in investor behavior rhyme from cycle to cycle, creating profound opportunities at the extremes. When attitudes of euphoria are widespread, prices assume the best and incorporate no fear, which is a formula for disaster. Conversely, when others are frightened and pull back, their behavior makes bargains plentiful, signaling an opportunity to be aggressive. Importantly, the movement toward the extreme itself supplies the energy for the swing back toward the midpoint.

EQ: Given that we cannot predict when the pendulum will reverse, how should a thoughtful investor approach market conditions informed by cyclical extremes?

HM: While we may never know where we’re going, we’d better have a good idea where we are. The circumstances must inform our behavior. Emotion must be resisted. I find myself using one quote more often than any other: "The less prudence with which others conduct their affairs, the greater the prudence with which we should conduct our own affairs". This means leaning away from the direction chosen by most others—selling when they’re euphoric, and buying when they’re afraid.

The Edward Quince Takeaway

Recognize that markets are rarely in the “happy medium,” but rather constantly oscillating between emotional extremes. Your goal is not to predict the next swing, but to be acutely aware of investor psychology—the more complacent and euphoric the crowd is, the more caution and prudence you must exhibit in your own actions.

Edward Quince's Wisdom Bites: The Human Calculus of Value – Beyond Prices and Pundits

Welcome back, discerning investors, to Edward Quince's Wisdom Bites! In our fast-paced world, where markets swing on every headline and narratives shift quicker than a meme coin's price, it's easy to get lost in the "noise and false stimuli". But as this blog consistently reminds us, true understanding comes from looking beyond the superficial, embracing uncertainty, and focusing on timeless principles. Today, we dive into a recent memo from investment titan Howard Marks, "The Calculus of Value", a piece that, despite its August 2025 publication date, offers profound insights perfectly aligned with our core investment philosophies.

Marks, known for his incisive market observations, opens his August 2025 memo by reflecting on the 25th anniversary of his "bubble.com" memo. He updates his perspective on asset values, building on his previous conclusion that while U.S. stock market valuations were "lofty but not nutty", they didn't necessarily signal a bubble due to a lack of extreme investor psychology.

Marks distinguishes between value and price, a fundamental concept for any investor:

• Value is subjective – what an asset is "worth" at a point in time, and it cannot be definitively found, "not even by AI, as far as I know".

• Price is concrete – it's simply the amount you pay to obtain something.

The essence of good investing, Marks asserts, is accurately estimating this subjective value and then purchasing it at a reasonable price. He notes that while his education at the University of Chicago taught a purely mathematical discounting process of future cash flows and earnings to determine a fair price, "in the real world, price is set by a different discounting process, which consists mostly of people applying their subjective opinions and attitudes about what the asset and its earning power are worth".

This brings us to Benjamin Graham's enduring analogy, which Marks also highlights: "in the short run the market functions like a voting machine, reflecting assets’ popularity. But in the long run, it’s a weighing machine, assessing assets’ value". Marks himself refers to a "calculus of value" that seems "entirely logical and almost mathematical," but crucially, it's "applied by people who aren’t". This human element – the subjective opinions and attitudes – is what truly drives pricing in the market.

Marks observes several factors currently "firing investor imaginations" and contributing to bull markets:

• The positive psychology and "wealth effect" from recent gains in markets, high-end real estate, and crypto.

• The belief that, for most investors, there's "no alternative" to U.S. markets.

• The excitement surrounding "today’s new, new thing: AI".

A central theme in Marks' memo, and a powerful warning, is the "this time is different" cliché. He quotes Sir John Templeton, who said that "20 percent of the time things really are" different. Marks struggles with this paradox, stating, "I just have no idea which of those two concerns is more valid today" – whether it's the cliché always bearing scrutiny, or the failure to recognize when things actually are different. He emphasizes that failing to recognize genuine shifts "stands between the average investor and superiority".

Marks' "The Calculus of Value" deeply resonates with this blog's core investment philosophies, particularly its emphasis on intellectual humility and filtering noise. Marks' admission that he has "no idea" which side of the "this time is different" paradox is more valid exemplifies the very "I don't know" mentality this blog advocates. It reinforces that "Nobody knows anything, and that's okay", particularly when it comes to complex market dynamics.

His distinction between objective value and subjective price underscores the importance of focusing on underlying fundamentals rather than getting swept up in market popularity or "fleeting narratives". The "calculus of value" being logical but "applied by people who aren't" perfectly illustrates how human nature and behavior "matters more than your forecast". It's a reminder that emotions and psychology, rather than pure logic, often dictate short-term market movements.

Marks' call to understand "the other side of the issue," as per John Stuart Mill's quote ("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that"), aligns with the blog's promotion of critical thinking and seeking diverse perspectives beyond mere "group think". This intellectual rigor helps cut through the "noise bottleneck" that bombards investors daily.

Ultimately, Marks' memo, like the timeless wisdom shared here, urges investors to move beyond the "daily deluge of financial 'news'" and the "constant pressure to do something". Instead, cultivate patience – because "the big money is not in the buying and selling, but in the waiting". It reinforces the wisdom that "Never interrupt compounding unnecessarily" by reacting to every "new, new thing".

In a world constantly seeking instant answers and quick gains, Howard Marks' "The Calculus of Value" serves as a powerful reminder of enduring investment truths. It reaffirms our belief that true success in finance, and in life, comes from embracing intellectual humility, discerning value from price, filtering out the pervasive noise, and adhering to patient, long-term principles. As always, "Clarity comes from subtraction, not addition". So, understand the human element, scrutinize every "this time is different" narrative, and let your discipline triumph over market drama.