FOMC Recap: FOMC Trade Deadline Edition

• The Fed held their policy rate target range at 5.25% to 5.50% as expected
• The FOMC Statement made changes to indicate a moderation in the employment picture and a slowing in the inflation picture. Noting that they are attentive to risks to both sides of their dual mandate.
• Powell said the FOMC does not making policy decisions based on an outcome of elections that haven't happened yet.

With the MLB trade deadline passing on Tuesday, the FOMC faced their own decision deadline today. Like MLB GM's, FOMC officials know the importance of making decisions with their goals in mind.  In the case of a MLB GM the pinnacle goal is winning the World Series.  For the Fed the pinnacle goals are low and stable inflation, maximum employment and moderate long-term interest rates, or more generally stated, fostering economic health.  

Every FOMC meeting is like the MLB trade deadline.  Just as MLB GM's need to decide whether to add or subtract to small parts of their roster or to wholesale change direction, the FOMC needs to decide what to add or remove from their statement, whether to do more or less of something they are currently doing with their policy tools, or in times of crisis deciding to do something they've never done before.  Like MLB GM's and all of us, the FOMC is making their decisions with their goals in mind, trying to face reality as it is, and prudently balancing going for it now against the risk of harming the future.  MLB GM's and FOMC officials face the added task of communicating their decisions to the public in a way that manages expectations.

There is often a realization that what got the team to where they are today won't get them to where they want to be, that when things stop evolving they stop compounding.  Every coach and manager knows that small decisions can lead to big results, especially when those decisions lead to actions that are able to use time to compound (long and variable lags anyone?).  They also know that bad decisions can compound in a negative way.  

While MLB executives would like to believe they have one goal or priority, which is winning a championship, the reality for some (most) franchises is they have a dual or multiple mandates, like the FOMC, and have to balance competing priorities that can often be in tension.  In many cases we have to prioritize one goal over another.  In the words of Greg McKeown:

"The word priority came into the English language in the 1400s. It was singular. It meant the very first or prior thing. It stayed singular for the next five hundred years. Only in the 1900s did we pluralize the term and start talking about priorities."

Further it was once written (you can find it, but I won't bias it):

"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. " 

I'm no Fed sympathizer, but the decisions the Fed has to make are hard. The decisions we all make are made under uncertainty and hard.

The decision by the FOMC today to make statement changes reflects the reality of the recent economic data they have consumed since the last meeting.  By not making any change to the policy rate today, the committee feels that progress toward their goals remains on a path they find acceptable.

It's hard to know exactly what questions the committee asked themselves as they made their decisions, but hopefully they collectively reached their decision based on their honest assessment of the state of the economy, without interference of political or external pressures, in a state where they were less concerned with their personal futures, uninfluenced by past criticisms, and more concerned with recognizing their decisions impact a complex ecosystem and need to be made with an eye toward protecting the people from undue harm from their decisions.  That is probably good a lens to make any decision (you can find many of these principles embedded in Charlie Munger's investment decision making).

The modern world loves to cling to a belief that everything can be controlled. There is probably a hefty "illusion of control" we place in the Fed, despite the fact that macro-forecasting is impossible (see Howard Mark's last memo).  Perhaps Powell said it best today:

"Certainty is not a word we have in our business".

Rather than be anxious to find certainty from the FOMC, perhaps we should rejoice that it is uncertainty that sets us free.  The best we can hope for out of the Fed is sound decision making guided by principled questions.