Stocks took an L, and are now 9-1 in their last 10 contests, still likely better than your favorite baseball team. The 3Y Auction was solid, printing through where WI was trading. On the whole, the S&P finished the day at 5,650, the 2Y Treasury yield rose to 3.84% and the 10Y to 4.35%
I guess the news of the tariffing films was enough to remind investors that tariffs are still a big deal. The ISM Services data looked pretty solid, but the comments also offered a reminder that tariffs uncertainty is impacting business conditions.
Or Was It That Girls Don’t Need 30 Dolls That Was Bearish?
Look, it’s only 3 or 4 dolls tops and 5 pencils tops, you got it? Maybe Trump’s comments on “consumerism” as part of the perceived problems with trade deficits aren’t bullish? We talked about “consumerism” in a post a few weeks ago when we talked about “Eat Now, Pay Later” loans and when you think about it, the whole Buy Now, Pay Later culture is analogous to trade deficits.
The trade deficit acts like Buy Now, Pay Later in that the country running the trade deficit is “buying now” (getting goods/services today) and “paying later” (by handing over claims on future income/assets). The difference is the U.S. gets to roll over this loan at very low rates for very long times.
Remember John Cochrane talking about this a few weeks ago? In which he talked about reforming “pro-consumption” policies:
“Cure the disease, not the symptoms. Reform taxes to tax consumption, not saving and investment. Stop funneling borrowed money to consumption. Cure the nightmarish cost, regulatory, and permitting bloat making investment so difficult, especially public investment.”
Speaking of Recycling Capital Into The U.S.
I’m sure you’ve seen the news about the Taiwan Dollar gaining over 8% against the U.S. dollar in two days. This story is a microcosm of the second order effects of attempts to rebalance trade. The driver is not 100% certain, but believed to be tied to trade discussions between the two countries and an increasing willingness for Taiwan to allow investment capital to flow into the country.
What’s interesting is that much of the discussion has been centered around the challenges Taiwanese financial companies face from a depreciating dollar. Apparently many Taiwanese financial companies hold unhedged U.S. dollar assets which are used to fund local currency liabilities.
Flipping The Tension On An Old Theme
The old story of currency crises was one of financial liberalization. Borders opened up, money poured into countries, countries and banks got access to borrow in U.S. dollars, etc. Usually that money pouring into the country would end up leading to a local credit crisis and when the “hot” money would flee the country the U.S. dollar would appreciate against the local currency. The central bank would try to support the currency but raising rates would be too hard on the local economy, so they’d get stuck and the depreciating local currency and strong U.S. dollar would make it nearly impossible for local companies and governments to pay back U.S. denominated liabilities.
In summary the currency crises of the past were largely “liability” side of the balance sheet problems that were exposed to dollar appreciation. With the unfolding of the Trump trade war and a revulsion against “liberalization”, is the “new” currency crisis one where foreign companies and governments that have accumulated U.S. dollar denominated assets going to be a crisis of the “asset” side of the balance sheet, where a depreciating dollar leaves these institutions unable to settle their local currency liabilities? I guess time will tell.
"The dollar is our currency, but your problem." — John Connally, U.S. Treasury Secretary, 1971
Seems like there might be some unhedged dollar longs out there.
Here Are Some Old Themes That Might Actually Be Worth Thinking About
With Warren Buffett fresh on our minds, I thought I’d share some Buffett adjacent wisdom shared by Marathon Asset Management founder Neil Ostrer on a recent episode of The Capital Cycle Podcast. Ostrer was discussing Buffett’s belief that evaluating company management, how they allocate capital and whether they earn good returns on that capital is crucially important to the valuation of the business. Ultimately management and the people they motivate to work every day matter because companies are dynamic organisms.
While that discussion is interesting, I thought I would share a summary of Ostrer’s views on management red flags:
Autocratic Management - you get the sense there really isn’t any real dialogue or discussion in those management groups. You see turnover and you’d realize people couldn’t get along with the boss.
The Investment Banker Turned CEO - these are people who are promotional, surrounded by sycophants and intolerant of criticism. Often they are utterly useless managers. Everything with them is a show towards capital raising.
Grandiosity - moves to fancy headquarters, management doing things you wouldn’t think are normal and down to earth both at the corporate level and in their personal lifestyles.
The Buffett influence is everywhere.
XTOD’s:
XTOD: Bessent’s Statement on U.S. Credit Risk and Rates SOURCE: @FirstSquawk
citing Scott Bessent, May 5, 2025 KEY STATEMENT: “If we can take away the credit risk of the U.S. government, interest rates will come down.” Let’s break this down with full-spectrum cognition…Thus, his core thesis: Rates are artificially high because the U.S. government itself is now the risk premium.
XTOD: The reason for persistent USD strength despite all the bailouts, money printing, stimulus, QE, whatever you want to call it…and why Trump is now trying to reset it…is not due to American Exceptionalism. It’s bc of the design or the system. The U.S. monetary system, and every other countries monetary system, is debt based. Which means it is leveraged. Which means it is essentially a carry trade in that currency. And everyone enters into some form of economic activity where expected return is higher than the “carry”. When the carry is exceeded, it’s great. When the carry is not exceed the system crashes. The US only runs a carry trade in one currency. The USD. Every other country runs a carry trade in two currencies. Their local currency and USD since need USD to operate on global stage.
This is a problem. Bc for these other counties, one of the carry trades is always going against them. This is bc floating exchange rates are a zero sum game. If the USD rises the other paired currency falls. In this event the USD carry trade goes against them. If USD falls and local currency rises, the local currency trade goes against them. They are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. And since the USD (or Eurodollar) carry trade is orders of magnitude larger the any of the smaller carry trades, it is the one that ends up dominating. It’s just a matter of time.
XTOD: Jason Zweig: "Expertise is rooted in pattern recognition, and Buffett has seen every conceivable pattern. I estimate—conservatively, I believe—that Buffett has read more than 100,000 financial statements in his more-than-seven-decade career." https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GqJP316asAAWBPz?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://x.com/onechancefreedm/status/1919440299450864021
https://x.com/SantiagoAuFund/status/1919123316549333149
https://x.com/trengriffin/status/1919184223224861180