Daily Economic Update: February 21, 2025

It was a down day in equity markets as the S&P 500 fell from record highs as blue chip stalwart Walmart offered up guidance that didn’t live up to market expectations, sending its shares down 6% on the day and dragging some other retail names down with it.

In data, jobless claims were a little above expectations and the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index declined (we talked about economic indicators back here).  The internals of the LEI showed a more pessimistic consumer with declining manufacturing hours.

But don’t get too worried (yet) as the six-month and annual growth rates in the LEI's are still trending upwards and we haven’t triggered their 3D warning.  Go ahead, try to explain the duration, depth, and diffusion to your coworkers, they’ll probably just stare blankly, like they were watching a 3D movie without the glasses. Don’t be surprised in a few years when the FOMC news conferences are 3D holograms explaining the duration, depth and diffusion of some economic disaster they likely helped cause.

Over in fixed income, yields were a little changed, with the 2Y at 4.28% and the 10Y at 4.51% as Bessent doesn’t seem overly interested in increasing the duration of the Treasury issuance. In Fedspeak, St. Louis Fed head, Alberto Musalem expressed some concern over the risk of un-anchoring inflation expectations.

The dollar hasn’t exactly been killing it of late, but gold has.  Treasury Secretary Bessent spoke about both the Dollar and Gold yesterday.  With respect to the dollar he indicated that he favors a “strong dollar policy”, but believes China is manipulating their currency.  When it comes to gold, he clarified that “revaluing gold reserves is not what I had in mind.”

There is a saying that almost everything is noise. Obviously we strive to find some signal in the noise and often that is found by zooming out to see the broader patterns and trends because the small incremental changes are so hard to see in the moment, but ultimately compound to have large effects.  One broader pattern that seems to be at play currently is in the realm of international economics.  We talked about trade, but more broadly there is a topic called “Geo-economics”, which is the study of the interaction of geopolitics and economics in foreign relations.  Geo-economics is an attempt to discuss how countries use economic means of power to achieve their strategic objectives.  The term was coined by Edward Luttwak in 1990 who argued that power comes from "disposable capital in lieu of firepower, civilian innovation in lieu of military-technical advancement, and market penetration in lieu of garrisons and bases".  My personal introduction to the subject was via the book “Geo-Economics” by research analyst and former chief investment officerJoachim Klement.

I bring up the topic today because it seems to be a topic that is part of a pattern that has been playing out over many years now.  This week we all see the headlines about Ukraine and obviously China is always front and center, but in the headlines we tend to get myopic and can easily get trapped in the noise.  There are a few voices out there that help capture the broader trends, an example being Ray Dalio’s work, “The Changing World Order”, that attempts to provide deeper context to the barrage of headlines, but it is easy to have our attention stolen and focus on a trivial issue and miss the vital signals. I won’t write today about the various geo-economic forces between the U.S. and Russia, or the U.S. and China, but the message is to step back and in some ways get back to basics on what geo-economic risks are important and can possibly be quantified and what might be the impact on various assets.  What are sources of actual meaningful data, not just headlines that matter?  I don’t have all of the answers, but there are some geopolitical risk indexes and economic policy uncertainty indexes that might be useful.  From an investment standpoint it’s always difficult to discern what’s priced in and whether risk-premiums are appropriate, I'll leave it to you to decide.

On the day ahead it’s S&P PMI’s, Existing Home Sales, UofM Feb (final) and whatever news comes out about tariffs or whatever else.

XTOD: Satya is Out   TLDR: MSFT doesn’t believe in AGI, wary of overinvestment, OpenAI partnership is over
A. AI and AGI are overhyped  

- “Us self-claiming some AGI milestone, that's just nonsensical benchmark hacking to me. The real benchmark is: the world growing at 10%.”

B. Very negative on more capex spend from MSFT

- “[If you look at the Industrial Revolution] there was a lot of money lost”

- “…countries are going to deploy capital… I'm so excited to be a leaser… I build a lot, I lease a lot.“

C. Value in AI is in infra where there is overbuild, and B2C apps which OpenAI has won, negative on model layer 

- “in consumer, in some categories, there may be some winner-take-all network effect. ChatGPT is a great example [of a] at-scale consumer property that has already got real escape velocity”

- “[in enterprise] buyers will not tolerate winner-take-all. … where the buyer is a corporation, an enterprise, an IT department, they will want multiple suppliers.. That is what will happen even on the model side.”

- “In the model layer, one is models need ultimately to run on some hyperscale compute.”

Opinion 

————

1. Satya is calling the bubble in buildout. The crazy people like govts are entering the game. He’s happy to lease from them when they overbuild. His own capex spend is capped 

2. He’s disappointed in the OpenAI partnership - he sees them as having built a great consumer app for themselves with dominance in the category, but models for enterprise usage have gotten commoditized.  

3. He’s sooo done with the AGI talk. If you can’t get to 10% global growth your AGI talk is meaningless to him 

4. He’s backing MSFT from the capex precipice. It’s funny because he certainly did make Google dance, and now they’re committed to insane capex. But he’s outta here 

One of the most meaningful @dwarkesh_sp  interviews so far

XTOD: The last 24 hours has had SO much tech news.

— Microsoft Majorana 1 quantum chip

— Google AI co-scientist

— xAI Grok 3 model release

— Clone musculoskeleton

— Claude reasoning coming soon

— Arc institute biological model

— Sakana AI CUDA kernel optimizer

XTOD: BESSENT SIGNALS DOLLAR POLICY CHANGE 

BESSENT Wants the Chinese to play their part in a global rebalancing. 

Threading the eye of a needle, the US Administration wants strong dollar fundamentals but a drop in its value.  This will have huge repercussions across all assets 

As clear a message as ever there was one. There is a deal to devalue the “strong dollar” especially bs the RMB. This will have massive reverberations on risk assets. The dollar will drop precipitously. Stocks across the board will get a huge boost as global growth rises in a weaker dollar environment. The question is whether China and the US can come to some for of agreement where the trade off between hostile trade processes / tariffs is  sufficient to allow Chinese and other central banks buy US bonds. To be clear if that trade off can be found, we’ll see a massive reallocation out of gold and into US bonds. The message  rhe Trump administration are sending on the debt/deficit might with foreign CB participation at increasingly large  US debt auctions might be enough to stop US 10’s breaking 5%. One other dimension that is profoundly important is the recent focus by Xi on reinvigorating the private sector ( look where Chinese tech stocks were when Jack Ma was taken in for reprogramming ) and today.

In recent days we’ve also had a commitment to support consumption. 

In my mind Chinese tech stocks will continue to confound global investors where there is a massive underweight. Unfortunately the anti China hubris and invective means many are still way behind the 🎱on long China tech. 

So much lower dollar across the board.

I’m bearish gold 

I’m bullish US bonds but prefer buying nearer 5%, but you have to have some here.

Long China tech and the Mag 7.

XTOD: Roughly half the IRS agents being laid off are in the division that handles filings from small business owners and the self-employed, according to CBS.  Notable: Business owners and the self-employed are responsible for a massive chunk of tax dodging each year.

XTOD:“Think of how stupid the average person is and then realize half of them are stupider than that.”  - George Carlin

https://x.com/8teAPi/status/1892383248661274699

https://x.com/deedydas/status/1892456208466108527

https://x.com/CurrencyWar1/status/1892557401896685950

https://x.com/JHWeissmann/status/1892639316569939969

https://x.com/Super70sSports/status/1892594419196440785

Daily Economic Update: February 20, 2025

Another record close for the S&P 500 at 6,144.  Despite the record highs, the equity performance has been relatively lackluster. It also seems like there is a decent amount of sector rotation going on beneath the surface.  If you want to dig into that there are probably better blogs and articles focused on the specific sector performance of late.  In the bond market, despite the threat of 25% tariffs on autos, semis, and pharmaceuticals, yields fell, with the 2Y treasury yield dipping back under 4.30 to 4.27% and the 10Y falling back to 4.54%. 

It was a day that ended in “y” so tariffs were in the headlines, however, there appears to be a shift in focus from the talking heads when it comes to the tariff topic. Sure inflation is still a big part of the narrative, but increasingly the talk seems to be centered on the impact on economic growth.  

Away from tariffs, but sticking close to the Trump Administration, DOGE has published their website which touts $55 billion in savings to date, but apparently only details around $8 billion. Much of the DOGE media attention has been focused on what was identified as $8 billion saved on a DEI contract, which turned out to be a typo or oversight and is really only an $8 million.  In fairness to DOGE an earlier version of the canceled contract had stated $8 billion as the amount, but it was definitely corrected and is only $8 million.  This has obviously been a source of fodder for all those who seem to hate DOGE.  Whether you agree with DOGE or not, it will be interesting to see how they deal with keeping this “wall of receipts” up to date and how they will account for Federal layoffs/buyouts and deal with things like canceled contracts that the government is still responsible for paying some portion of, amongst other cases.  These savings become increasingly important as Trump claims to want to give 20% of the savings to Americans, presumably through checks of some sort.

The Minutes of the FOMC meeting held on January 28-29, 2025 were released yesterday.  I’ll do my best to summarize them for you here. [Paraphrasing the Fed]:  Besides that stubborn inflation problem, everything looks good to us. In addition, please ignore the super-tight credit spreads and super low equity risk premium. We at the Fed are sure we’ve got no risks to financial stability.  And because we have more access to data than everyone and a track record that is pretty bad at forecasting, you should feel comforted that we have no clue about the scope, timing, and potential economic impacts of possible changes to trade, immigration, and fiscal policies. In the meantime, sit back until March 19th and don’t worry we’ve got this.

Jobless claims and Fedspeak on the day ahead.

XTOD: Dave Portnoy(@stoolpresidente) created $Greed and bought 357.92M $Greed (35.79% of the total supply).   He sold all $357.92M $Greed in a single transaction, causing the price of $Greed to crash by 99%.  And he made ~$258K from $Greed.  Next, Dave Portnoy created $Greed2 and currently holds 268.25M $Greed2(26.8% of the total supply). Keep your funds safe and be aware of risks!

XTOD: Imagine it’s 2035 and you’re looking back at 2025. What do you think is going to be glaringly obvious by then that isn’t obvious to most people now?

XTOD: We have a new report out, "Probabilities and Payoffs: The Practicalities and Psychology of Expected Value." We discuss some of the issues with the calculation of expected value, what the payoff picture means for investing, the implications of volatility drag, the psychology of dealing with probabilities and payoffs, and how these ideas can be helpful for investing in various asset classes.  2/Here's a link to the report: https://morganstanley.com/im/publication/insights/articles/article_probabilitiesandpayoffs.pdf

XTOD: Palantir taking a hit after everyone finally realized no one knows what the fuck this company does

XTOD: I've spent the last 8 months traveling to 20+ states, talking to young people about how they see their economic futures. I wrote about my findings (link below).  Gen Z faces a double disruption: (1) AI-driven technological change + (2) institutional instability. When I talk to young people, they're not just worried about finding jobs, they're worried whether "careers" as we know them will exist in 5 years.  We're seeing a version of the barbell strategy in how young people approach their futures. On one end, people are choosing trades over college debt. On the other, people are betting everything on creator economy/crypto/AI startups etc etc. The middle path exists, but it's increasingly blurry.  This shapes identity. When a single viral TikTok can outperform a year's salary, and traditional credentials lose value faster than you can earn them, young people aren't just changing careers—they're developing fundamentally different relationships with economic reality.  When I talk to people across the country, their concerns are greater than traditional political divisions. They're wrestling with questions of identity, meaning, and community in a world where traditional narratives about success and stability no longer hold.  What looks like a conservative shift among young voters might actually be something more foundational: a generation's attempt to navigate a world where institutions promise stability they can't deliver, where algorithms offer opportunity without security, and where the very nature of work and worth is being redefined. It’s constantly evolving, and it’s not just politics - it’s the very nature of self being called into question. Link in next post. https://t.co/fruEznSL8B

https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1892048208618193014

https://x.com/shivon/status/1891981099955355678

https://x.com/mjmauboussin/status/1892222741668925620

https://x.com/alifarhat79/status/1892316835539722354

https://x.com/kylascan/status/1892237843139018979

Daily Economic Update: February 19, 2025

Yields rose and stocks found a way to set a new record high.  The S&P finished at 6,129, despite Meta snapping its winning streak.  The 2Y ended the day at 4.31% and the 10Y reclaimed 4.50, now yielding 4.56%.

There was little in the way of tangible data, but home builder sentiment fell as tariff concerns on the cost side.

Gold hit new record highs at 2,934. Gold was also in the news as Elon toys with the idea of auditing Fort Knox at the urging of Rand Paul.

I’d write more, but I gave you a decent amount yesterday, did you read it all?  If so and you’re bored, use the search function and search for something like “uncertainty”.

On the day ahead we get new housing starts, FOMC Minutes and the 20Y auction.

XTOD: Pershing Square has submitted a proposal to Howard Hughes Holdings (NYSE: HHH) http://howardhughes.com to acquire 10 million newly issued shares of the company at $90 per share.  When combined with the 18.9 million shares that are currently held by the Pershing Square Funds, we will own 48% of the company.   If the transaction goes forward, I will become Chairman and CEO, Ryan Israel, CIO, and Ben Hakim President, and we will make available the full resources of Pershing Square to HHH to build a diversified holding company, or one could say, a modern-day Berkshire Hathaway.  

The new HHH will acquire controlling interests in private and public companies that meet Pershing Square's criteria for business quality.  HHH's principal subsidiary, Howard Hughes Corporation, led by David O'Reilly CEO, will continue on its mission and strategic plan to develop, grow, and own small 'cities,' or master planned communities. HHH's major holdings include the Woodlands in Houston, Summerlin in Las Vegas, Teravalis in Phoenix, and a 60-acre condominium development project on Waikiki Beach in Hawaii called Ward Village. 

Owning small and growing MPCs that will eventually become large cities in the best pro-business markets in the country is a great long-term business.  It's a lot better than a dying textile company.  You can learn the details about the transaction here: https://businesswire.com/news/home/20250218932320/en/Pershing-Square-Announces-Revised-Proposal-to-Howard-Hughes-Holdings  We look forward to sharing more about the story tomorrow at 9am EST.  The presentation will stream live from my X account 

@BillAckman

XTOD: Bill, why are you asking to get paid 1.5% of HHH's mkt cap every year? This is obviously not the way Buffett does it.

XTOD: "why shouldn't I charge a fee on market cap and call myself the next Warren Buffett?"

XTOD: Worth noting that all the recent news over plane crashes is probably just the result of attention bias Plane crashes are still on a downward trend  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GkFizhBWEAA745U?format=png&name=small

XTOD: Three questions determine 99% of the happiness in your life:

1. What am I working on and why? 

2. Who am I spending time with and why?

3. How well am I treating my body and why? 

Everything else is noise.

.

https://x.com/BillAckman/status/1891957378603491339

https://x.com/Seawolfcap/status/1891960752027627890

https://x.com/FrederikNeckar/status/1891985556449460422

https://x.com/IAmMarkManson/status/1891851918575599955

Daily Economic Update: February 18, 2025

As we recover from Valentine’s Day and a President’s Day lengthened weekend, we enter the week with the S&P at 6,114, the 2Y Treasury yielding 4.26% and the 10Y Treasury yielding 4.48%.  

Over the weekend SNL celebrated 50 years with some incredible performances and skits. While this blog will likely never make it to the 50 year mark (let alone 5 year mark), it has almost made it to the 50 day mark of 2025 and that’s a feat worth celebrating.  I couldn’t get Sir Paul McCartney to guest write today and Bill Murray wouldn’t do a top 10 for me, so you’re stuck with my best attempt to make a mildly entertaining list of topics or narratives that define the first 50-days of 2025.
T - tariffs, duh. You can add “reciprocal” in front to make it more fun too.

A - A.I., remember DeepSeek?

R - r-star of course.  I know the Fed forgets it, but I don’t.

I - inflation, did it ever really go away?

F - Federal Reserve, that last meeting, useless.

F - fiscal policy, unsustainable?

I guess Tariff is one of the best words in the dictionary.

We concluded last week’s economic data with a weak retail sales data point, which is already forgotten.  The real narratives of the last week are twofold (and I’m using “everyone” the way my kids use “everyone”).

First, everyone is now an expert in the GDP equation. So current narrative number 1 is centered on how reduced government spending and reduced government employment will “automatically” reduce GDP…because math, duh…G goes down.  Of course most of the thinking you find related to the current narrative stops at this first order and gives no consideration to what comes next, or in other words how the private sector responds.  A person laid off from a government job, do they collect unemployment (a government spend) or do they get a job in the private sector?  The bottom line is there is a lot to think through in terms of the impact on GDP.  Could there be demand side contractions due to government layoffs?  What does private sector absorption of those people look like?  What about increased entrepreneurship as a possibility?  What about the possibility that the laid off employee is way more productive in the private sector?  Ultimately productivity is a major factor in Real economic growth.

Second, everyone is mapping the current inflation prints to the inflation prints of the 1970s and writing their own opinions as to whether we’ll get a second inflation spike or not.  It’s fun, but since you can get the best economist in the world together in a room and it’s likely they will disagree about what caused inflation in the first place and what policies are most effective at curing inflation in the second place, the whole discussion just seems like media fodder.  I say that not to dismiss the risk of inflation rebounding, but to reiterate that the whole narrative should likely be couched as a discussion about risk, not simply passing around charts that overlay two time periods on top of each other as many are wont to do.

The week ahead in data is a slow one, so you’ll have to look to the Administration and DOGE for entertainment....and they probably won't dissappoint.

Today: Empire Mfg. Fedspeak

Wed.: Housing starts, building permits, FOMC Minutes, 20Y Bond Auction

Thur: Jobless claims, Fedspeak

Fri:  S&P PMI’s, Existing Home Sales, UofM Feb (final)

XTOD: NBA Player- “I can’t play in the back to back because my knee is a little sore 😖” 

NHL Player- “I am willing to die for my country in this exhibition”

XTOD: 'll admit I am not sure what @riteshmjn's (or Luke's) "second derivative" is here. I will, however, point out that if the USG suddenly stops paying X% of GDP into the economy, it does not mean the US GDP is instantly and permanently downsized X%.

XTOD: Zero chance the Dimon audio "leak" is unintentional. Zero.   It's the recruitment ad for the people who will replace the people who are huffy about it

XTOD: Meta stock has yet to have a down day since Zuck got caught starring at the cleavage

XTOD: “The universe wants you to be typical- in a thousand ways it pulls at you. Don’t let it happen.”

https://x.com/bigcontentguy/status/1890950449232011407

https://x.com/bauhiniacapital/status/1891075003203920039

https://x.com/HedgeDirty/status/1890263635274133550

https://x.com/allstarcharts/status/1890849977192022115

https://x.com/ImadeIyamu/status/1890628283865186717

Daily Economic Update: February 14, 2025

I was going to send chocolates to all my readers for Valentine’s Day, but when I saw cocoa prices at 50 year highs and married that with the fact this blog currently pays me $0, I just couldn’t swing it…come to think of it, you should be sending me chocolate.  

PPI rhymes with CPI and comes in hotter than expected as well with the headline at 0.4% and the YoY headline at 3.5%.  The ex-food and energy measures were still hot as well.  There was some optimism that the medical care categories of PPI declined, which might bode well for the read through to PCE, but we’ll see.  In labor data, jobless claims remain benign, falling to 213K. 

The 30Y Treasury auction was not very inspiring for a country that has a lot of debt to sell, particularly if that country is interested in terming out that debt.  A tail of 1.2bps, with a relatively low bid-to-over and weakness in indirect demand.  On the day the 2Y yield moved back down to 4.30% and the 10Y yield gave back to 10bps moving back down to 4.53%.  The narrative tied to the move lower in yields is increased tariff uncertainty leading to a bid for safe havens, whether or not that’s true is hard to know.

In equities, stock indexes moved higher with the S&P 500 trading up to 1% to 6,115.  If you weren’t paying attention it probably wouldn’t feel intuitive that a foreign indexes like the FTSE or STOXX are outperforming the S&P so far this year.

Tariffs in the headlines again, with Trump announcing reciprocal tariffs as had been mentioned yesterday.  The devil will be in the details as the messaging is that they’ll essentially be going line by line and country by country to put tariffs in place. The other wrinkle to the tariff news is that the administration will be thinking about tariffs in terms of broad factors, including the impact of VAT taxes, currency devaluations, and any other policies the U.S. trade representative deem to be unfair.  Trump also mentioned that tariffs on autos might still be on the come.  

On the day ahead we get Retail Sales and Industrial Production data. Then we get a 3-day weekend!

XTOD: “The Big One” - Reciprocal Tariffs would likely increase US tariffs from $75 B in 2024 to ~ $1 T in 2026.  Reciprocal includes anything that taxes or discriminates against US business.  Market shrugging off as largely a negotiating tactic despite the words to the contrary.

XTOD: As mentioned on @CNBCFastMoney  The summer easing of financial conditions and aggressive fiscal spending in 2H of 24 is impacting data the last few months 

The tightening of financial conditions in bond yields and Fed pause and the government expenditure cuts and tariffs will cause the data to slow in 2Q

XTOD: Because the PPI components that feed into the PCE index (financial and healthcare services) were soft in January, the core PCE index is estimated to print well below the big 0.45% increase in the CPI.  A 0.27% increase in core PCE for Jan would drop the Y/Y rate to 2.6% from 2.8%

XTOD: Even under low interest rates, interest becomes the largest federal expenditure in 17 years, and will consume half of all annual taxes within a few decades.  Voting to add even more debt and interest costs is wildly irresponsible.

XTOD: Hats off to the Apollo associate that made this chart  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GjqxP7cXYAEE0Bh?format=jpg&name=900x900

XTOD: We’re prone to asking “What should I do?” but less prone to asking “What shouldn’t I do?” Since what we don’t do determines what we can do, I like asking about not-to-do lists.

https://x.com/altcap/status/1890115417638908229

https://x.com/dampedspring/status/1890041104478662724

https://x.com/NickTimiraos/status/1890057499098911076

https://x.com/JessicaBRiedl/status/1890075114701746505

https://x.com/tferriss/status/1889759868174688296

Daily Economic Update: February 13, 2025

 The CPI report came in hotter than expected and following the report the market now just has one rate cut priced in for the remainder of the year.  The pain points in the report were really everywhere, but eggs, rents and car insurance all remain trouble spots.  In Powell’s second day of testimony his message was much the same as the day prior, that there’s no rush to move the policy rate. The 2y yield moved up to 4.36% and the 10y treasury yield backed up to 4.64%.  The 10y treasury auction was about average.

Stocks managed to do ok, all things considered, ending the day off the early morning lows  The S&P 500 finished at 6,050.  The earnings picture has been strong and Trump headlines about working on de-escalation in Ukraine seemed to help sentiment.

The topic of reciprocal tariffs remains front and center.

On the day ahead we get PPI, jobless claims and the 30y auction.

XTOD: It was a wild Wednesday in markets news, with Trump demanding lower interest rates, inflation surprising to the upside — and Fed Chair Powell keeping the train on the tracks

XTOD: CPI in 60 seconds: 

1) The rise in commodities is making inflation sticky. That creates some modest upside risk. 

2) But this story remains *mostly* about shelter. And commodities need to rise MUCH more than this to offset the continued shelter disinflation, which I expect to revert to its 40 year average. 

3) This isn’t a second wave. If it is, it’s a sad little wave. SAD. 

4) No rate cuts this year unless the labor market really starts to fall apart.

XTOD: All benefits in life come from compound interest, whether in money, relationships, love, health, activities, or habits. I only want to be around people I know I’m going to be around for the rest of my life. I only want to work on things I know have long-term payout."

XTOD: The most inspiring thing I've read this year. Read it three times, it will change your life. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gjjy6B7WoAI6UW2?format=png&name=medium

https://x.com/business/status/1889813360474018296

https://x.com/cullenroche/status/1889724826866348162

https://x.com/NavalismHQ/status/1889633548778480126

https://x.com/Kpaxs/status/1889527413677117559/photo/1

Daily Economic Update: February 12, 2025

Have you heard of DIKW?  It is an acronym for a pyramid of the theory of knowledge.  You start with data as a building block, then you make inferences from the data so that it has some meaning - we call this information, then we place the information into a context where it can be understood - we call this knowledge.  At the top of the pyramid is wisdom, or broadly exercising sound judgment and acting accordingly.  I think about this pyramid from time to time when I listen to financial news, political talk, and the like, you know things like listening to Fed testimony, and I ask myself whether there is anything beyond “data” (and perhaps not even quality data) in what is said.  If the goal is to increase the confidence in your investment or business decision making, does much of what we consume move the needle?

When it came to his testimony, Powell said the Fed is in no rush to lower rates. In other Fed news, Cleveland Fed’s Beth Hammack highlighted the risks to higher inflation that could be the result of government policies.  While Hammack doesn’t believe rate hikes are necessary, she did express the need for further evidence that inflation is sustainably heading back to 2%. NY Fed Williams offered up his view that we should get back to 2%, but for uncertainty around everything in the economy (labor, capital, trade, regulation, etc.). Fed officials - helpful as usual.

The S&P 500 finished up on the day at 6,068. The 2Y treasury remained near 4.30% and the 10Y moved up to 4.53%.

Kind of away from politics, but perhaps closer to politics and having a more direct impact on the economy than anything else, Elon Musk changed his X handle to Harry Bolz. I don’t know if this increases the chances he can buy OpenAI or find trillions of dollars of corruption, but what do I know?

Maybe Elon’s DOGE is on to something and foreigners know it, I mean they seemed to show up to the 3Y Treasury auction yesterday.  The 3Y auction had a strong bid-to-cover, printed through where when-issued was trading, and had strong indirects bidders.  Strong demand for treasuries didn’t stop this headline: “A $RETARDIO whale just bought $4.03K of $DOGSHIT2 at $3.83M MC” whatever that says about the state of the economy.

On the day ahead it’s CPI and Powell in focus.

XTOD: Powell: The neutral rate was "clearly very low before the pandemic" and it is likely that after all of this, "the neutral rate will have risen meaningfully."  "I think it has moved up. And many of my colleagues on the FOMC" also do.

XTOD: Accenture had $1.2 billion in new bookings related to GenAI, and it has 69,000 people working in data and AI.   69,000 people who don't know anything about AI are helping the largest US companies with navigating the fast changing AI world.  One of the biggest grifts in the world.  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GjdckNHXAAIGm5P?format=jpg&name=900x900

XTOD (it’s really long so if you want to read the whole thing find the link below): Two insightful articles on how AI is making general knowledge worthless, and private, proprietary data infinitely more valuable: 1.  @benthompson : "It is suddenly clear to me how much future economic value is wrapped up in information not being public… Secrecy is its own form of friction, the purposeful imposition of scarcity on valuable knowledge. It speaks to what will be valuable in an AI-denominated future: yes, the real world and human-denominated industries will rise in economic value, but so will the tools and infrastructure that both drive original research and discoveries, and the mechanisms to price it."  2.  @anecdotal : "in the AGI era, the only defensible reason for universities to remain in operation is to offer students an opportunity to learn from faculty whose expertise surpasses current AI. Nothing else makes sense...Universities will retain faculty in three categories: those advancing original research beyond AGI capabilities, those who teach the use of advanced equipment and sophisticated physical skills, and those handling previously undiscovered source materials or developing novel interpretations that outstrip AGI’s analysis.  

XTOD: Thomas Merton, read it twice https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gjhl79aXYAAoOm5?format=png&name=900x900

https://x.com/NickTimiraos/status/1889351386162155838

https://x.com/rohitdotmittal/status/1889080825318141963

https://x.com/buccocapital/status/1889020292686553329

https://x.com/DylanoA4/status/1889372509000143259

 

Daily Economic Update: February 11, 2025

No more pennies, did you see that news? I’m waiting for someone to launch a penny memecoin to replace the physical penny.  Would you be surprised if ‘Pennycoin’ trades at some insane price? I wouldn’t – especially if Dave Portnoy ends up buying it.  Feel free to X/Tweet Dave this idea or a link to this blog - I think he'd be onboard.

If we can't get Dave, and Pennycoin is a project you are passionate about working on, leave a note in the comments – if Hailey Welch can figure out how to launch a coin, I’m sure we can too - let’s work together to make the penny worth something again.

If we eventually run out of pennies, do we have to stop pricing things such that they end in 0.99?  Is that inflationary?  Nah, who am I kidding, eventually there will be no physical currency that requires change anyway.  

Speaking of inflation, the NY Fed’s consumer survey bucked the UofM trend, showing the median inflation expectations holding steady at 3%, while the 3Y and 5Y median inflation expectations rose by 0.3% to 3.0%.

By now I’m sure you’ve seen some articles pointing to a correlation between Philadelphia sports championships and poor stock market performance. For example, the Phillies won the world series in 2008, the Eagles in 2018, both bad years for stock investors, will this time be different? 

If the Eagles win will spur a sell-off, it didn’t start yesterday as the S&P traded up to 6,066.  Yields on the long end moved up a little higher as news of 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum seemed to cause some questions around inflation.  The 2Y was relatively unchanged at 4.29% and the 10Y yield moved back up to 4.50%.

If you didn’t get a chance to participate in yesterday’s poll, please click on yesterday’s post and vote.  As of now about 60% of respondents expect a lower 10Y Treasury yield come March 31, 2025.

Ahead of us, Wednesday’s CPI report and Powell’s semi-annual testimony, which starts with the Senate today, are the highlights.

Today: Powell Senate, other Fedspeak

Wed: CPI, Powell House

Thur.: PPI, Jobless Claims

Fri: Retail Sales, Industrial Production

Have you been on LinkedIn lately? A few weeks ago I shared a X post comparing LinkedIn to OnlyFans, I mean really, just swap out one type of image for humblebrags and corporate porn. I feel like I’m old enough to remember when LinkedIn was a more straightforward professional networking platform, but now it’s full of engagement-bait posts, personal life stories that barely relate to work, and self-promotional content disguised as "thought leadership." Some people even treat it like a corporate influencer platform, complete with overly polished personal brands.  

As a user of the platform, I would like to see the elimination of engagement bait and more user control over who sees what and what is seen amongst other changes.  As a consumer more broadly, I am increasingly frustrated in so many areas of life where I feel trapped in ecosystems that don’t serve me well, but “network effects” make it hard for people to leave those ecosystems. I have some ideas on solutions, reach out in the comments if you think you might be interested in hearing them.

We’ll see if Powell says anything interesting, or if anyone says anything funny today.

XTOD: Patrick Mahomes was reportedly "distracted" during the Super Bowl, allegedly frustrated and confused over why big tech keeps burning billions on AI capex without a clear game plan, sources claim.

XTOD: Also his company is a 7x since IPO  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GjYGj9gWYAA3GlB?format=jpg&name=900x900

XTOD: We are in the part of the cycle where Dave Portnoy can make a 2,500,000% return on a memecoin about him going to jail for pumping another memecoin. The Big Short 2 is writing itself as we speak.

XTOD: “If you only wished to be happy, this could be easily accomplished; but we wish to be happier than other people, and this is always difficult, for we believe others to be happier than they are.” - Montesquieu

https://x.com/TheTranscript_/status/1888937101451759620

https://x.com/tomowenmorgan/status/1888704310982463642

https://x.com/litcapital/status/1888642272104779993

https://x.com/morganhousel/status/1888642608509157637