As we approach the election, increasingly we are inundated with experts expressing with much certainty their financial views. This is often done with much confidence, yet generally short of much more than abstracted terms like increased volatility, horrible consequences, game ending outcomes, big down turns, etc. Sometimes the discussions center around something of a paradox whereby without massive deficits the economy will fall into some disaster, yet with further deficits we are certain to end in disaster. Other times it is about the yet to be felt consequences of the "lags" of monetary policies or some other topic which again has generally been on the radar for a long time now.
Whoever the expert and whatever the view there is generally some explicit or implicit message that you must do something now. Perhaps it's more wise to consider whether there is more wisdom below than what you hear there:
"We will continue to ignore political and economic forecasts which are an expensive distraction for many investors and businessmen." - Warren Buffett
"Often we tell ourselves, “Don't just sit there, do something!” But when we practice awareness, we discover that the opposite may be more helpful: “Don't just do something, sit there!" - Thich Nhat Hahn
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." – Mark Twain.
We all know elections occur regularly, often an investor might experience multiple elections over the hold period of an investment. We also know that the cost to insure against risk is generally not when it's being experienced, you probably want to buy the fire extinguisher before the fire.
The point is not whether the views of the experts are right, or to argue that you should bury your head in the sand, it's not. The point is to more clearly know the difference between investing and speculating (discussed here and here and here) and to remember that even when experts tell you that you must do something around the election even in the vein of "risk management", that "risk management" is actually a process, one that is generally well served by understanding why you are taking any risk in the first place, a goal. Often good advice is to build a risk management culture. Perhaps your risk management process coupled with new information that comes to light might lead to action, perhaps not, and likely not in some alarmist way.
With respect to risk management perhaps there is more wisdom here than in all the expert calls to do something you'll continue to hear:
"Taking a risk without a goal is just like getting in a car and driving around aimlessly expecting to wind up in a great place" - Allison Schrager
“[Risk management] is not just in responding to anticipated events but in building a culture and organization that can respond to risk and withstand unanticipated events. In other words, risk management is about building flexible and robust processes and organizations.” - John Coleman
Of course as Jason Zweig noted:
"All investors labor in a cruel irony: We invest in the present, but we invest for the future. And, unfortunately, the future is almost entirely uncertain. Inflation and interest rates are undependable; economic recessions come and go at random; geopolitical upheavals like war, commodity shortages, and terrorism arrive without warning; and the fate of individual companies and their industries often turns out be the opposite of what most investors expect. Therefore, investing on the basis of projection is a fool's errand; even the forecasts of the so-called experts are less reliable than the flip of a coin. For most people, investing on the basis of protection - from overpaying for a stock or from overconfidence in the quality of their own judgment - is the best solution."
Thinking in terms of preparation over prediction, discipline and process over emotion, recognition of
the folly of certainty are probably better mental frameworks than the soundbites designed to get clicks.
In the words of Benjamin Graham in his classic book "The Intelligent Investor", Margin Of Safety is
"in essence, that of rendering unnecessary an accurate forecast of the future".
A prudent way to navigate the inherent uncertainty in the world and economy is by maintaining some flexibility, a buffer, a margin of safety and a level of creativity in planning. This flexibility isn't free, it's the extra turn of leverage not taken, it's the liquidity not deployed, or other analogous things, but it also provides a valuable option to change course when things aren't working out. It creates a condition to increase the odds of survival and survival is what allows individuals and businesses to adhere to Charlie Munger's first rule of compounding: "The first rule of compounding is to never interrupt it unnecessarily".
Anyway, that's my speil to start your week.
We start a new week at new all-time highs, people still loving Netflix, a 2Y at 3.95% and a 10Y at 4.08%. On the week ahead, it's earnings, Fedspeak, PMI's and Durable goods as highlights.
Mon: Fedspeak
Tue: probably rest
Wed: home sales, Beige Book, Bank of Canada
Thur: jobless claims, home sales, PMI's
Fri: Durable Goods, UofM final
XTOD: The McRib is back. BTC historically goes up >2x after the McRib returns. Don't fade the McRib. Not financial advice. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GaMkC2qbUAAHl9Q?format=jpg&name=900x900
XTOD: From Edelweiss Holdings PLC Owners Manual - Anthony Deden's firm. Excerpt from "Chapter 7 - Value is not a Number" https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GaLIQ1YW4AAdM4z?format=jpg&name=900x900
XTOD: GOLDMAN: "We estimate the S&P 500 will deliver an annualized nominal total return of 3% during the next 10 years (7th percentile since 1930) and roughly 1% on a real basis."
XTOD: Getting really into finance is bad for investment performance, past a certain point. You're fine with a simple investment program and chilling. You will outperform most other investors over the long run. But - if you're really into finance you'll get shiny object syndrome. "Oh, leverage that portfolio up. Oh, futures. Maybe I should hedge. Oh, I heard this guy on a podcast with a great macro take. Perhaps I should act on that. This commodity is at a 50-year low. This merger is gonna go through and the market is wrong. I should short China because demographics. I should go long China because valuation. This s*itco is net cash. Maybe this is the next Monster Beverage." etc. That's why it's good to have a small account to get that stuff out of your system & scratch the itch so you don't screw up the boring portfolio that's actually gonna work.
XTOD: "Most of what I know about writing I’ve learned through running every day." Murakami