"We think they are days from failure. They think it is a temporary problem. This disconnect is dangerous."
Thursday, November 9, 2023
Daily Economic Update: November 9, 2023
Wednesday, November 8, 2023
Daily Economic Update: November 8, 2023
Tuesday, November 7, 2023
Daily Economic Update: November 7, 2023
Monday, November 6, 2023
Daily Economic Update: November 6, 2023
Friday, November 3, 2023
Daily Economic Update: November 3, 2023
XTOD: Let’s talk about US consumers for a bit, shall we? How fucked are they? Pretty fucked. Certainly more fucked than what Q3 data led everyone to believe.
Thursday, November 2, 2023
Daily Economic Update: November 2, 2023
This morning yields are down again, with the 2Y at 4.96% (down ~10bps from yesterday morning) and the 10Y at 4.72% (down almost 20bps from yesterday morning). Equities have also rejoiced. The Treasury Refunding Announcement and FOMC/Powell lead to a big move lower in yields yesterday. Fixed income investors responded to smaller than anticipated sales of 10Y, 20Y and 30Y auction sizes as well as the Treasury indicating that increased auction sizes are likely not going to be persist past another quarter. As it relates to the FOMC, the release and press conference were generally viewed as "dovish" in the sense that there was no clear commitment to further hikes as the tightening of financial conditions may be doing the job of rate hikes. Otherwise on the day, data was generally ok, with JOLTS data showing continued tightness in the labor market. The Atlanta Fed GDPNow is estimating 1.2% growth for 4Q, a pretty sharp drop from 3Q, and traders are estimating a very low probability that the Fed hikes again this December.
On the day ahead we get the Bank of England, jobless claims and Apple earnings.
Wednesday, November 1, 2023
FOMC Recap: It's a Vibe
- As expected, the FOMC is on hold for the second straight meeting, leaving the Fed Funds target range at 5.25% to 5.50% and leaving QT unchanged
- The Fed remains committed to returning inflation to its 2 percent target
- Powell is not confident yet that rates are sufficiently restrictive to bring inflation back to 2%, not thinking about rate cuts
- The rise in long-term yields has been viewed as being driven by exogenous factors that should slow the economy and effectively do the job of additional rate hikes as long as there is a persistence of these higher yields
"risk refers to all outcomes that can be insured against, uncertainty to those which cannot."
" ..uncertainty as both Keynes and Knight define it, but which the mainstream denies: a situation where we have no scientific basis for calculating a ratio (probability)."
Effectively, Keynes (as reported by Skidelsky), defined risk and uncertainty as being on a continuum: "The magnitudes of some pairs of probabilities we shall be able to compare numerically [cardinal probabilities], others in respect of more or less only (i.e. 'more or less likely', "ordinal probabilities), and others not at all [uncertainty]."
Fortunately one of the great triumphs of Finance is that it gives us ways to manage risk through innovations such as insurance and hedging. Unfortunately, it cannot eliminate all uncertainty, and of course taking some level of risk is necessary to meet return objectives.
A prudent way to navigate the inherent uncertainty in the world and economy is by maintaining some flexibility, a buffer, a margin of safety and a level of creativity in planning. This flexibility isn't free, it's the extra turn of leverage not taken, it's the liquidity not deployed, or other analogous things, but it also provides a valuable option to change course when things aren't working out. It creates a condition to increase the odds of survival and survival is what allows individuals and businesses to adhere to Charlie Munger's first rule of compounding: "The first rule of compounding is to never interrupt it unnecessarily". Perhaps this is why the Commercial Real Estate industry has clung to the motto "survive to '25".
Just the other day economist Brad DeLong shared a substack post which discussed the long-run outperformance of U.S. equities over U.S. government bonds. After reviewing the data, which shows the 65004-to-41 wealth gap in favor of stock investors since 1870, he posits: "But if stocks are such a good deal for the long run, why are our investors in the stock market not richer?" to which he retorts: "there is a reason why they are not even richer. It takes time for the law of averages to work itself out. And "average" is only "typical" if you have that time. If you lose your stake and cannot continue to play, you do not have that time. Mathematically, your strategy may have had a high expected return. But the typical investor who undertakes that strategy never sees that expectation."
It is unfortunate that the ideas of market efficiency and staying the course seem to be fighting an uphill battle of late. After all, if we all thought there was certainty that a financial crisis was right around the corner, we would all act on that information today and in essence we would cause that crisis today. In theory all of this negative sentiment, and the beliefs about fiscal and monetary reaction functions are already "priced in" to today's markets We also generally know that investors who try to time the market fail, or even if they can get out at the right time (top), they fail at redeploying their capital when the market truly does look cheap (even based on whatever metrics led them to sell in the first place). Perhaps the reason these ideas sometimes fall by the wayside is that people find it much more interesting to read a post about recession or doomsday than to read a post about risk management.
Back to the Fed, can the Fed engineer a "soft landing", can they get inflation back to 2% without pain? I don't know. In my last FOMC recap, I described what I see as the three main "endings" to the current rate hike cycle that I see most commonly discussed in financial media, these are broadly (1) soft landing, (2) financial repression or (3) hard landing.
I don't know how the economy will unfold from here, or what other "shock" will hit in the interim, but I think that I know that surviving through whatever downside scenarios you can imagine will allow you to most fully maximize returns in the long run.
Daily Economic Update: November 1, 2023
Weird not posting a quote to start this...but we survived October despite stocks making it 3 straight months of losses. FOMC decision day is upon us. WWPD? Ahead of the 2pm FOMC decision, markets await the Treasury's announcement of the specific amounts and tenors of Treasuries to be issued in upcoming auctions and the anticipated Treasury buyback program. Long end yields are higher to start the day with the 10Y back over 4.90% (with 10Y real yield back above 2.50%), while the 2Y is unchanged at 5.07%. Equities are weaker, but at least stocks are the Yen yet. USD-JPY crosses 151 and approaches a 30 year weakness for the Yen. Elsewhere in Asia, Chinese manufacturing activity PMI's were below expectations and Biden will be meeting with Xi in San Francisco later this month. This Reuters article says that "important details need to be hammered out.." but I can't help but think that means the White House needs to figure out how to remove all the feces from the sidewalks. (you can google it)
On the day ahead we get ADP Employment, Treasury Announcement at 830am, ISM Manufacturing and JOLTS.
Check back this afternoon after Powell for my FOMC recap.
XTOD: My plea for adequate funding for the IRS: I think we all love our country, and if we all love our country, we need our government to be able to function. That means being able to collect taxes—as Justice Holmes famously said, they are the price we pay for civilized society.
XTOD: Just spent 5 days in NYC speaking to funds, lenders and other allocators who we place for. Quick takeaways: 1. I believe it’s earlier in the down cycle than I initially thought 2. There’s a lot of knife catching currently going on; little understanding that the first buyer is often not the last buyer in a downturn 3. There’s almost no real underwriting being done on the end users of the real estate 4. There’s a lot of distrust for the government and at the same time complete unequivocal belief in a bailout if needed. This is insane - you can’t have it both ways 5. “Traffic syndrome” is in full effect (people sit in traffic but can’t admit they’re part of said traffic) when it comes to employment. Everyone is outsourcing, automating and reducing and no one believes it’ll affect them 6. There’s a lot of fraud in the market and in a quarter I might say it’s more serious than last time because it affects higher-value assets much more than housing. Not ready to say this yet, but maybe soon 7. Slowly seeing predatory capital line up at the fringes of the markets. Not ready to enter yet, but sniffing for pray from the sidelines. This is not capital that regularly invests in real estate And while you might think this is grim, I believe that as long as the consumer remains strong there’ll be major reshuffling in commercial real estate (including housing) but not in residential (end-user) housing. However, if the job market breaks due to corporate debt loads, structural unemployment and seeking efficiencies, there simply won’t be consumer demand for a lot of the real estate that is currently occupied because man will not be able to afford it at any price.
XTOD: This is key -- it's really the first time in the age of mass communications that adversaries of the United States have had messaging supremacy within the United States proselytizing directly to American youth. It's a major coup and it happened without anyone noticing.
XTOD: A Missouri jury has found the National Association of Realtors (NAR) guilty of conspiracy to inflate commissions - NAR and defendants have been ordered to pay $1.78 billion in damages
XTOD: Cant overstate impact of ruling just out saying National Assoc of Realtors conspired to inflate commissions. NAR has beaten back every challenge to the realtor business model for decades. That may now change. Just one lawsuit but market whacking real estate related stocks. 2-3% total realtor commission on the way? Hundreds of thousands of families rely on that income
XTOD: Interesting. Nominal ECI wages are steady or slightly higher in Q3. This is ~1% higher than the job number's average hourly earnings, which is more between 3.5 and 4% now. Interesting. Nominal ECI wages are steady or slightly higher in Q3. This is ~1% higher than the job number's average hourly earnings, which is more between 3.5 and 4% now.
XTOD: The pace of wage growth is consistent with what you would expect with 3.2 to 3.7 percent inflation depending on which data series you're looking at.
XTOD: Did @Wealthfront's vanity risk parity project cost its clients $500 million (and counting)?Yet another cautionary tale from liquid alts land. Summary: Wealthfront is a pioneer in the robo advisory business. Good! Cheap and efficient access to model portfolios. Then they tried to build a hedge fund product to look cooler than other robos. Bad. Really bad. Here's the story....
XTOD: Looking back at this video of Chamath from 2 years ago is so amazing. " I want to be an instrument, like Berkshire, for the retail investors to help them close the inequality gap for themselves." Yes, you've helped them so much sir. $CLOV -91% $DM -91% $SPCE -85% $OPEN -81% $MILE Delisted SO PROUD OF YOU HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
XTOD: Another weird admission Sam made to me came up. At trial, Sam's basic position has been that he didn't know what was going on. But to me, he described a meeting at which he, Caroline, Nishad and Gary had decided to extend more credit to FTX. Prosecutor: "Do you recall telling Zeke Faux in December of 2022 that when Alameda repaid its third-party lenders, you understood that there was a risk to FTX?" Prosecutor: "I'm going to direct you to page 226-227. And I want to direct your attention to the middle of the page, where it starts, 'You were.' And just ask you to read those two sentences to yourself." Prosecutor: "Does that refresh your recollection about whether you told——whether Zeke Faux said to you, "You were all aware there was a chance this would not work?" And you said, "That's right, but I thought that the risk was substantially smaller"? SBF: "I don't recall that, no."
XTOD: If we assume the point of investing is ultimately to improve your quality of life and the quality of life of those you most care about, investments that consistently add stress over long periods of time probably don’t make sense. Money is traded for things or experiences that catalyze certain feelings. If your investments are generating the opposite spectrum of feelings, it might be time to reassess. It’s easy to miss the forest for the trees. Money is a means, not an end. And in the end, most things matter very, very little. Do what helps you sleep at night and wake up with a low heart rate. To me, those are the hallmarks of a world-class investor who gets the big picture.
-
Arctic Wisdom Remember your job is to identify the book and post your answer. You can also simply share any thoughts in the comments. Today’...
-
I see no a priori way to answer the question of whether a central-bank policy of holding the money supply constant, limiting the liquidity...
-
One Big Beautiful Blog Why is this blog One Big Beautiful Blog? Well the plan for this blog was to write "the definitive guide to finan...
Daily Economic Update: June 6, 2025
Broken Bromance Trump and Xi talk, but Trump and Musk spar. I don’t know which headline matters more for markets, but shares of Tesla didn’...