FOMC Recap: Got Debt?

• Fed cuts 25bps to 4.50% to 4.75% range as expected
• The statement removed the sentence that the Committee had gained greater confidence that inflation was moving sustainably to 2%.
• "In the near term the election will have no effect on our policy decisions." "We don't guess, we don't speculate, we don't assume what policies will get put into place."
• Powell seemed to characterize the recent run up in bond yields as being driven largely by expectations around growth and decreased risk.  He further questioned whether there will be any persistency to the recent yield moves, characterizing the moves as "not a major factor" in how they are thinking about things"
• "We don't comment on fiscal policy" he further characterized the path of fiscal policy as "unsustainable" and a "threat to the economy" over time.
• Powell comments that he will not resign.

Raise your hand if you've heard a lot of recent talk about fiscal policy and deficits recently?

" Deborah Lucas was the moderator, and she asked a much more pointed question just right out of the gate when the panel started, and she asked, how much bearing does the fiscal theory of the price level or some version of that have on your thinking at the Fed?"

" if you take this theory seriously, it really undermines the whole point of the Federal Reserve"

The quotes above are from the David Beckworth's most recent episode of Macro Musings, during which he was discussing the Hoover Institution’s recent monetary policy conference, *A 50-Year Retrospective on the Shadow Open Market Committee and its Role in Monetary Policy*  with his guest Jon Hartley.

With so much post-election talk about the sustainability of debt, deficits and the like, along with some talk heading into the election around the Fed's independence and the occassional calls to end the Fed, I thought the comments above were interesting to consider.  After all if fiscal policy is a major driver of inflation how is the Fed supposed to fulfil their price stability mandate?

Is it an unspoken secret that the macroeconomic models include some budget constraint and some fiscal-monetary coordination.  As one of the leading proponents of the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level, John Cochrane would say that the Central Bank can move or smooth inflation over time, but that ultimately they don't have full control:  "the Fed’s interest rate target sets expected inflation, fiscal policy sets unexpected inflation."  and "the Fed makes a threat: If unexpected inflation doesn’t go where the Fed wants it to go, the Fed will blow up the economy with hyperinflation or hyper deflation. "  He also says "If you don’t like my little fiscal theory model, we don’t have a good model of the most basic question, how higher interest rates lower inflation, without a contemporaneous fiscal tightening." and "The news is that without such contemporaneous austerity, higher interest rates don’t lower inflation at all in standard models. Intuitively, if the Fed raises interest rates, that raises interest costs on the debt. Taxes must rise or spending must fall to pay those interest costs. If not, no reduction in inflation."

Which bring me back to my favorite quote about the role of central banks:

"I define central bank independence in one sentence, it's the ability to raise interest rates when the Treasury doesn't want you to. And the Treasury almost never wants you to, because of the cost of the debt.” – Peter Stella

I think my general commentary over the years (and here)  has been to remember that there is a lot of economics and finance that we just take for granted as to our understanding as to how it all works. If you’re reading this and are now questioning your worldview of interest rates and FOMC policy — good. 

Irrespective of the economic models you believe in, it's undeniable that that they all contain unobservable variables and are difficult to test empiracally. 

As for the FOMC today, Powell was well prepared for election related questions, including questions around whether he could legally be fired by the President.  He admitted that there are policies that come through Congress can have an impact on economic variables that will ultimately be taken into account.

Listening to the Powell presser, I was left largely with an impression that the FOMC is struggling to communicate what lane they are driving in, they're largely trying to say in the "middle" of the road. It sounds like they originally set a goal in the rate hiking cycle that they would bring inflation back to target, without declaring victory in terms of meeting that goal, they started to drive out of that lane and are now "in the middle".   

I'm sure there are some blogs or even self-help books out there about being stuck in the "messy middle".  Since I haven't read any of them, for my advice to the Powell Fed, I'll stick closer to my knitting and encourage Powell to listen to the wisdom the late, great Mr. Miyaki of the 1984 movie classic "The Karate Kid" gave to Daniel-san with regards to the risk of only being moderately committed to your goals.

“Walk on road, walk right side, safe. Walk left side, safe. Walk middle, sooner or later, get squish just like grape”