Yesterday was a bad day for McDonald's quarter-pounders and to have formerly headed Abercrombie and Fitch. Second straight red day for equities. Gold has now returned almost as much as the S&P over the last 12 months, which is kind of insane to think about. In an essentially no data day, the IMF did revise up their forecast for 2025 U.S. GDP growth to 2.8%. Nevertheless we couldn't make it a day without more warnings about the U.S. fiscal situation, this time from Paul Tudor Jones, who invoked his fear of a "Minsky moment" as it realates to a sudden recognition that the fiscal situation is "impossible".
If you're not familiar with Hyman Minsky, I had recently summarized his "financial instability hypothesis" for someone as "calm plants seeds of crazy - you assume good news is permanent, are oblivious to bad news, ignore bad news, deny bad news, then panic at bad news, believe bad news is permanent, and ultimately repeat the cycle in the opposite direction. Hyman Minsky thought the idea of eradicating recessions was nonsense - thus his financial instability hypothesis."
The term "minsky moment" was coined by PIMCO's Paul McCulley back during the Asian financial crisis, to refer to the tipping point in the economic cycle, often when "apparent stability begest ever-riskier debt arrangements, which further begat asset price bubbles. And then the bubbles burst, in something I dubbed a "Minsky moment." In general the Minsky moment progresses in a forward fashion through three debt units:
“hedge” financing units, in which the buyer’s cash flows cover interest and principalpayments; “speculative” finance units, in which cash flows cover only interestpayments; and “Ponzi” units, in which cash flows cover neither and depend on risingasset prices to keep the buyer afloat."
Once the moment occurs, it all works in reverse, with falling asset prices, higher risk premiums, lower leverage and economic contraction. How close is the U.S. sovereign to experience such a moment, I don't know? I would venture to guess advocates of MMT would vehemently disagree with all this rhetoric. If you're unfamiliar with MMT you can read my post here.
In other news, Howard Marks dropped his latest memo "Ruminating on Asset Allocation". My takeaways:
- In a world where there are so many asset classes, his ephiphany of late is that "at bottom, there are only two asset classes: ownership and debt"
- It's an enormous difference to own vs. to lend. Owners have no promise of return, lenders have a contractual "fixed outcome" assuming the borrower makes good.
- Choosing between the two is the most basic thing investors must decide.
- To anchor the decision, Marks' says you must first indentify a "risk posture", how much emphasis you want on preserving (defense) vs. growing capital (offense). Calling this preservation vs. growth, mutually exclusive and a "inescapable truth in investing."
- The absolute level of risk must be conciously targeted and the level of risk in the portfolio must be well compensated.
- A higher expected return with further upside potential, at the cost of greater uncertainty, volatility, and downside risk? Or a more dependable but lower expected return, entailing less upside and less downside? The choice between the two is subjective, largely a function of the investor’s circumstances and attitude toward bearing risk. That means the answer will be different for different investors.
- Even after investors determine their "normal risk posture", they face a choice: they can maintain that posture all the time or deviate on occassions of market attractiveness.
- As "risk" incrases, not only do expected returns increase, but the range of possible outcomes becomes wider and bad outcomes become worse.
- "All ways of getting to a certain risk level will produce the same expected return." There are no free lunches, in theory. However, Marks' states "in reality, markets are not efficient in the academic sense of always being "right" and gains can be acheived through skill.
- He believes that it's difficult to advocate for investors to depart from their "sweet spot" in terms of risk level because many managers who are believed to possess alpha turn out not to.
- He concludes with a quick plug for investors to conisder the certain of allocations to credit at current levels, which he sees as returns of 7-10% (likely only obtainable in high-yield in private credit in my estimation)
On the day ahead it's home sales, Fed Beige Book and Canada eh?
XTOD: The Intelligent Investor newsletter. https://createsend.com/t/d-8876921A5A4BB3532540EF23F30FEDED Happy Ben Graham day, everyone!
XTOD: First Druckenmiller (the GOAT) and now PTJ…“All roads lead to inflation. I’m long gold. I’m long Bitcoin” - Paul Tudor Jones Incredible how far Bitcoin has come.
XTOD: JPM Asset Management's chief global strategist David Kelly was asked at a reporter roundtable about risks to his current forecast. He gave some great evergreen investing advice.
1.) It's always the risk no one talks about.
2.) Zoom out. It likely won't matter in the long run.
XTOD: Remember! pessimist sounds smart but optimist makes money Geo-political instability is temporary but commerce is the fundamental backbone of civilization FII selling, Inflation, Recession all are expensive distractions for long term investors
XTOD: “The most valuable personal finance asset is not needing to impress anyone.” — Morgan Housel
https://x.com/jasonzweigwsj/status/1848741927350374898
https://x.com/Geiger_Capital/status/1848739824531841456
https://x.com/_JoshSchafer/status/1848450188844888186
https://x.com/CivEngg_Adarsh/status/1847932541803577597
https://x.com/MoneyWisdom_/status/1848687915120853007
No comments:
Post a Comment